28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lifetime. With very few exceptions, rocket engine turbines have lives that are<br />

exceedingly short when compared with more conventional turbine applications.<br />

A German engineer who participated in the development <strong>of</strong> the F-1<br />

engine turbine once told me, ‘‘The design lifetime <strong>of</strong> our machines was<br />

intended to be 25 years [he was referring to hydrodynamic power plant<br />

turbines in Europe]. Then I start to work on this machine, and I asked about<br />

the intended design life. They told me it was 160 seconds!’’ While the current<br />

trend is toward lives considerably in excess <strong>of</strong> this, the basic idea is still<br />

valid.<br />

Rapidity <strong>of</strong> startup is another somewhat unique problem area. Rocket<br />

turbines are <strong>of</strong>ten required to transition from a ‘‘cold start’’ to rated power<br />

output in 2–3 sec. The transient loading resulting from this very rapid power<br />

buildup has been the cause <strong>of</strong> turbine blade failures. It should also be<br />

pointed out that the startup loads issue has a strong thermal component as<br />

well as a mechanical one. Since rocket turbines are normally powered by<br />

gases that are products <strong>of</strong> combustion, the gas temperature increases from<br />

nearly ambient to its full value within the same 2- to 3-sec time period. This<br />

may be accompanied by transient overshoots in both gas temperature and<br />

chemical composition due to the action <strong>of</strong> the engine’s control system. The<br />

turbine must tolerate these, and they must not compromise design life.<br />

Rocket turbines operate with working fluids <strong>of</strong> a very high energy<br />

content, and this energy must be extracted in as efficient a manner as<br />

possible. This is somewhat problematic (as mentioned earlier) due to<br />

relatively strict size and weight limitations placed on the turbine package.<br />

With the advent <strong>of</strong> hydrogen-based working fluids, old problems are<br />

compounded and new ones created. For a number <strong>of</strong> reasons, blade speed in<br />

rocket turbines is normally lower than desired. Also, due to hydrogen’s high<br />

specific heat value, gas spouting velocities tend to be higher in hydrogenoperated<br />

turbines than in turbines operated with other propellant<br />

combinations over the same pressure ratio. This combination <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

tends to move the operating point for a turbine stage toward a lower range<br />

<strong>of</strong> velocity ratio, where maintaining a given efficiency is difficult. In<br />

addition, a heated hydrogen environment under elevated pressure creates<br />

the potential for a turbine blade environment that is chemically adverse. A<br />

great many metallic materials are subject to premature embrittlement and<br />

failure in a hydrogen environment. Although this failure mechanism may<br />

not represent a serious problem for an expendable rocket turbine, it may<br />

have to be considered in the design <strong>of</strong> longer-lived and reusable machinery.<br />

What represents ‘‘consideration’’ varies from case to case. In one instance, a<br />

problem may be avoided by wise choice <strong>of</strong> blade or disk material and/or<br />

processing methods. In a more acute case, blade speed may be limited or derated<br />

by the necessity <strong>of</strong> keeping blade loading below a threshold value.<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!