28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elevant optimization techniques for turbomachinery design applications is<br />

given. The main focus <strong>of</strong> discussion is the use <strong>of</strong> MDO procedures for<br />

component design applications associated with gas turbine engines. The<br />

design <strong>of</strong> turbine blade geometry for improved heat-transfer performance is<br />

used to demonstrate one particular multidisciplinary, multiobjective<br />

optimization technique. Particular emphasis has been placed on the bladecooling<br />

(internal and external) aspect <strong>of</strong> the design.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> formal optimization techniques for engineering design<br />

applications has reached a high level today [6, 7]. Most <strong>of</strong> the optimization<br />

techniques developed for engineering applications are typically capable <strong>of</strong><br />

addressing only a single design objective at a time subject to several<br />

constraints, which restricts the applicability <strong>of</strong> the procedure [8] since such<br />

problems usually involve multiple design objectives. A common practice in<br />

addressing multiobjective optimization problems has been to combine<br />

individual objective functions in a linear fashion using weight factors [9] that<br />

are user-specified, thus requiring input based on user intuition and/or prior<br />

experience. Another common method, called the modified global criterion<br />

approach [8], combines the individual objective functions into a single<br />

composite function using separately determined target values for the<br />

objective functions. Optimization <strong>of</strong> the composite function corresponds<br />

to optimizing the individual objective functions. This requires that separate<br />

optimization be performed for each objective function in order to obtain the<br />

target values, which could be computationally prohibitive for complex<br />

designs. Several efforts for developing multidisciplinary, multiobjective<br />

design optimization procedures have been initiated during the past few<br />

years. One such procedure is the Kreisselmeier–Steinhauser (K–S) function<br />

technique [10, 11], which is capable <strong>of</strong> addressing design problems with<br />

multiple objectives and inequality constraints. The multiobjective optimization<br />

formulation used in the design optimization problem described in the<br />

present chapter is based on the K–S function technique [12–17], and a brief<br />

description <strong>of</strong> this approach is given later.<br />

A popular design optimization technique used in aerospace applications,<br />

especially in gas turbine design, is the inverse design method in which<br />

the required performance characteristics, such as a pressure distribution or<br />

velocity distribution about the turbine blade, are prescribed and the<br />

geometric parameters are modified iteratively to arrive at a configuration<br />

that satisfies the prescribed criteria. An extensive review <strong>of</strong> inverse design<br />

methodologies for aerodynamic shape design has been presented by<br />

Dulikravich [18]. Such a procedure for the design <strong>of</strong> blade coolant passages<br />

with specified temperatures and heat fluxes has been developed by<br />

Dulikravich et al. [19, 20]. An iterative procedure for three-dimensional<br />

blade design using a transpiration model along with a modified Euler solver<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!