28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Some studies showed that the cooling effectiveness can be increased by 60%<br />

at a realistic pressure ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.03, if the hole is made at an angle <strong>of</strong> 208<br />

versus being normal to the wall surface. It is clear that practical<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> angled effusion cooling is highly dependent on an ability<br />

to accurately, consistently, and economically manufacture large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

oblique holes <strong>of</strong> very small diameter. Advances in laser drilling have made<br />

this possible, and this cooling method is now regarded as a viable and<br />

economically acceptable technique. At the present time, the lower limit on a<br />

hole diameter is about 0.4 mm, whereas the lowest attainable hole angle is<br />

just below 208. Andrews [110–113] presents a number <strong>of</strong> papers that are<br />

widely used for advanced liner cooling design. Full coverage discrete hole<br />

impingement cooling and effusion film cooling are extensively used in gas<br />

turbine blade and combustor wall cooling. However, most applications and<br />

most experimental investigations for these cooling techniques are used<br />

separately. The combination <strong>of</strong> impingement and effusion cooling <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

good means <strong>of</strong> improving the overall cooling effectiveness <strong>of</strong> both turbine<br />

blades and combustor walls and <strong>of</strong> minimizing the coolant flow required to<br />

achieve the desired cooling effectiveness. Combined impingement/effusion<br />

cooling with equal numbers <strong>of</strong> holes, but the main pressure loss at the<br />

impingement holes, has very good internal wall heat-transfer characteristics<br />

with increases <strong>of</strong> 45% and 30% found for two designs, relative to the<br />

impingement-only situation. Studies <strong>of</strong> combined impingement–effusion<br />

cooling yielded the following conclusions:<br />

The combined impingement–effusion cooling heat transfer was not<br />

greatly influenced by the effusion wall design for the effusion–<br />

impingement hole diameter ratios.<br />

The measured combined impingement–effusion heat-transfer coefficients<br />

were lower than the sum <strong>of</strong> the separate impingement and<br />

effusion wall heat transfer by approximately 15–20% for the two<br />

designs tested. This indicates that there was an interaction between<br />

the two heat-transfer modes, which reduced the net heat transfer.<br />

The overall cooling effectiveness results demonstrated the large<br />

benefits to be obtained from the addition <strong>of</strong> impingement cooling<br />

to effusion cooling. However, the film-cooling part <strong>of</strong> the process,<br />

which was strongly dependent on the effusion hole size, had a strong<br />

influence on the wall impingement–effusion heat-transfer coefficient.<br />

Cost, increased weight, durability, and ability to repair the angled effusioncooled<br />

liners are the main concerns that limit their application. These issues<br />

can only be fully resolved by extensive service experience.<br />

Future developments in angled effusion cooling will tend to focus on<br />

the optimization <strong>of</strong> hole geometry. A diffuser-shaped expansion at the exit<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!