28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

Handbook of Turbomachinery Second Edition Revised - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is a parasitic device, whose flow requirements have to be added to the pump<br />

flow capacity. If the balance piston is included in the initial design, this need<br />

not present a problem. However, if the device needs to be added as a retr<strong>of</strong>it,<br />

its flow requirement can penalize both the efficiency and the suction<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the pump to some degree. There have been past cases where<br />

unanticipated high rotor thrust has necessitated the addition <strong>of</strong> a balance<br />

piston. The addition <strong>of</strong> this device was both difficult and costly. As stated<br />

previously, the accurate prediction <strong>of</strong> axial thrust during design is <strong>of</strong> the<br />

utmost importance.<br />

Using the techniques and references outlined in the preceding<br />

paragraphs, it should be possible to compute representative axial thrust<br />

forces for any desired turbopump component. The next important design<br />

consideration concerns how these components are mechanically integrated<br />

to form a complete turbopump.<br />

Axial thrust considerations affect the mechanical design integration <strong>of</strong><br />

the turbopump in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. How are the turbine and pump<br />

components to be coupled, and what will be their physical arrangement?<br />

What types <strong>of</strong> axial thrust control devices are necessary, and how will they<br />

fit into the overall design? If any axial thrust issues remain, can they be<br />

resolved by some relatively simple mechanical design change(s)? If not, aero/<br />

hydrodynamic modifications to turbine and/or pump elements may prove<br />

necessary.<br />

In many instances, the basic coupling and arrangement <strong>of</strong> turbopump<br />

components will be dictated by considerations other than axial thrust, and<br />

the designer will have little or no freedom to alter them. For example, in the<br />

turbopumps for the Thor and Atlas missiles, the independent shafts for the<br />

turbine and the twin pumps were made necessary by the large angular<br />

velocity difference between the two. In this case, the turbine axial thrust was<br />

reacted to by a suitably sized ball bearing on the turbine shaft. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

the pumps, it worked out that the fuel (RP-1) and oxidizer (LOX) pumps<br />

exerted axial thrust loads that were similar. In this event, the pumps could<br />

be placed in a back-to-back arrangement on the same driveshaft such that<br />

the pump thrusts were, for the most part, <strong>of</strong>fset. The unbalanced thrust<br />

again was reacted to by a suitable ball bearing. It should be noted here that<br />

the ability to react to the steady-state unbalanced thrust with a rolling<br />

element bearing was facilitated by the relatively low shaft angular velocity<br />

(approximately 6,000 rpm) and the availability <strong>of</strong> an excellent bearing<br />

lubricant in the form <strong>of</strong> the RP-1 fuel mixed with an extreme-pressure<br />

additive. Few contemporary machines will enjoy this luxury.<br />

A simple example <strong>of</strong> a direct-drive turbopump with thrust reacted to<br />

by a rolling element bearing is shown in Fig. 28. In this example, the<br />

pumping element is a large (12-in. diameter) inducer, which imparts a head<br />

Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!