FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
chapter. In some countries several years have passed without the chapter obtaining a formal charter.<br />
Once registered, nonprofits may face onerous formal reporting requirements.<br />
Another problem is cooptation by the state. Some nonprofits provide services such as health<br />
care, education, and housing. Their financing may be provided by the state or by aid funds<br />
administered by the state. Thus their very existence depends upon cooperation with public<br />
authorities. As a consequence, they may be reluctant to criticize officials openly. To avoid such<br />
tensions, an NGO that takes on an anticorruption mandate should avoid participation in service<br />
delivery.<br />
The World Values Survey found that organizational membership may contribute to<br />
democratic change.<br />
27<br />
One would like, however, to know more about how this happens. The<br />
sector‘s impact ought to depend upon the kinds of groups that attract members. My own<br />
hypothesis would be that policies that encourage the development of those nonprofits that interact<br />
with government can help institutionalize democracy but that nonprofits that simply build ―social<br />
capital‖ through sports, recreation and cultural activities will not, on their own, have much impact.<br />
d. Avenues for Individual Complaints<br />
Fighting high level corruption requires national attention and private organizations willing to<br />
push leaders for change. In contrast, limiting low-level bureaucratic corruption is often in the<br />
interest of top officials who may try to enlist ordinary citizens in the effort. This can be done<br />
without organized citizen activity if individuals can lodge complaints easily and without fear that<br />
corrupt officials will take revenge.<br />
Some bribes are made to get around the rules and others are made to get a benefit that<br />
should have been provided for free. Facilitating complaints will only help uncover the latter type of<br />
corruption. Bribes that permit illegal activities or that soften a legal regulation or tax assessment are<br />
unlikely to be revealed by private individuals and firms unless they have been arrested and are<br />
seeking to mitigate their punishment. In contrast, if bribery demands are a condition for obtaining a<br />
legal benefit, individuals may not go along if they can appeal to an honest forum.<br />
Many countries have established Ombudsmen to hear complaints of all kinds, not just those<br />
related to malfeasance. These offices can help increase the accountability of government agencies to<br />
ordinary citizens. Hence they may generate a great deal of resistance from politicians and<br />
bureaucrats. Although this is regrettable, one should have modest expectations for an Ombudsman.<br />
These officials seldom uncover large scale systemic corruption and generally lack authority to<br />
initiate lawsuits.<br />
27<br />
The list of organizations in the WVS ranges widely to include labor unions, political parties and<br />
professional<br />
associations as well as all kinds of community groups and organized nonprofits (Inglehart 1997: 396).<br />
106<br />
Page 27<br />
27<br />
Some public agencies have created ―hot lines‖ for direct citizen complaints. This method<br />
will only be successful, however, if complainants can preserve their anonymity or do not fear<br />
reprisals. ―Hot lines‖ must be more than just symbolic. Public officials--the Ombudsman, agency<br />
oversight units, or law enforcement agents-- must follow up on complaints in a visible way. At the<br />
same time, if the complaints concern individuals, the accused must have a credible way of defending<br />
against false accusations. Otherwise, an anticorruption campaign can degenerate into a collection of<br />
private vendettas with people enlisting the state to settle their private feuds.<br />
3. Corruption and Government Reliability<br />
Corruption is commonly associated with untrustworthy government officials. It underlying<br />
cause is the search for private economic gain on both sides of the transaction. It represents a<br />
betrayal of public trust. Corruption can be controlled by lowering the benefits and raising the costs<br />
of particular corrupt transactions. But it can also be controlled indirectly by limits on political power<br />
and by changes in public attitudes toward the exercise of that power. This latter strategy involves<br />
giving people and groups a way to complain about poor government service provision. To facilitate