FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
wrath is seen as directed at our own individual sinfulness, rather than that of Adam. It<br />
therefore avoids the problems associated with the idea of inherited guilt.<br />
The main problem with this account is that sinfulness is an acquired characteristic, but<br />
that acquired characteristics are not inherited. Inheritance is a genetic process, but sin is<br />
not in the genes and so cannot be passed on by this means.<br />
Social Heredity<br />
On an alternative account, social rather than physical heredity is the means by which<br />
Adam‘s sin is transmitted to us. On this view, Adam‘s sin merely set a trend, a bad<br />
example. Each of us who follows this example does so on his own head. Again, this<br />
account holds that Adam‘s sin is a cause of our sinfulness, but that we too play an active<br />
role in original sin by choosing to commit the sins for which we are condemned; Adam is<br />
a bad influence, but nothing more.<br />
The main difficulty with this view is that social heredity appears to be too weak a process<br />
to explain the widespread nature of sin. Although children do imitate their parents to<br />
some degree, not all children imitate their parents in every degree. There is no guarantee<br />
that an example such as Adam‘s will be emulated by all, and so this form of the doctrine<br />
of original sin fails to explain universal sinfulness, and so fails to ground the universal<br />
need for salvation that is so central to Christianity.<br />
Sailom's Philosophy<br />
Discussing philosophical or scientific issues and their possible applications in politics.<br />
Monitoring daily world news headlines and commenting them.<br />
Tuesday, November 07, 2006<br />
Corruption Perception Index - Transparency International<br />
Here is an international comparison of corruption levels. I only selected the countries<br />
with the biggest economies + the least corrupt country and the most corrupt one.<br />
As a whole, there are no suprises: poor coutries tend to be the most corrupt.<br />
However, we can also notice the high level of corruption in Italy (a rich country).<br />
The Indians are not that corrupt... given that they are much poorer than the Mexicans,<br />
the Russians or the Iranians.<br />
V<br />
51