FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
extremely high in the region. The second assumption is that the institutional framework<br />
achieved as a result of the transition from authoritarian regimes in the 1980s was sufficiently<br />
democratic to allow a constant process of further democratization. Following this assumption,<br />
Congress and the judiciary would become increasingly more legitimate, and would gradually<br />
reduce the discretionary authority of the executive. The third assumption was that economic<br />
liberalization would complete the transitional process, increasing the legitimacy of political<br />
institutions in the long run and reducing corruption. Economic reforms would reduce<br />
Page 3<br />
discretionary authority of the executive by means of privatizations, trade and financial<br />
deregulations, and creation of independent agencies. To implement such reforms, concentration<br />
of power in the hands of the president would be beneficial in the short run, once economic<br />
reforms could be implemented promptly. In the long run, such use of autocratic mechanisms<br />
would payoff, as a result of the increasing transparency, reduction of the discretionary power of<br />
the executive, and, most importantly, economic development.<br />
I will discuss these three assumptions in the each of the four following sections of this<br />
paper. In section two I will clarify basic concepts and detail the hypothesis of this paper. In<br />
section three I will discuss a few theories of corruption focusing on their ambivalent position<br />
regarding executive supremacy. Some theories argue that corruption and executive supremacy<br />
might be necessary evils to achieve economic development. Others would state that corruption<br />
impairs development, or that the mere concentration of discretionary powers creates<br />
opportunities for corruption. I will present an alternative approach, arguing that corruption is<br />
correlated with economic inequality and that Latin American societies are trapped in a vicious<br />
cycle of concentration of political and economic power that prevents the establishment of<br />
responsive democracies. The fourth section will focus on theories of political and economic<br />
transition in Latin America describing how those theories justified the development of a political<br />
system based on executive supremacy. The political theory of transition was based on elites‘<br />
pacts and advocated the implementation of a gradualist path to democratization. Regarding<br />
economic theories of transition, I will focus on how they perceived the relation between<br />
economic reforms and the consolidation of democracy in the region, and why they advocated the<br />
use of executive supremacy to implement such reforms.<br />
1<br />
See Lawrence E. Harrison, U NDERDEVELOPMENT IS A STATE OF MIND :<br />
THE LATIN A MERICAN CASE (MadisonBooks, 2000).Page 43<br />
In the last section of the paper I will focus on one particular constitutional feature of<br />
presidentialism in Latin America, which is the executive authority to legislate by means of<br />
presidential decrees. This characteristic is particularly interesting because it is directly related to<br />
the three assumptions that I outlined above, and this analysis will inform my conclusions and<br />
proposed institutional reforms. First, broad executive decree authority is probably the most<br />
significant aspect of ―executive supremacy‖ in Latin America. However, as I will point out in<br />
more detail, it is also a characteristic of institutional weakness of the executive itself, the<br />
legislative, and of the political parties in the region. Moreover, executive power to rule by<br />
decree is an institutional mechanism which survived the transition from authoritarianism.<br />
Finally, decrees were also widely used in the process of economic liberalization in the 1990s,<br />
increasing the speed of reforms and limiting the participation of dissenting groups. Finally, the<br />
fact that such reforms increased income inequality and poverty in many countries of the region<br />
also impacted in the legitimacy of post-transition political institutions.<br />
2. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America<br />
This is an interesting moment to get back to political reforms towards democratization in<br />
Latin America. Interesting because such debate was unjustifiably overlooked in recent years,<br />
under the assumption that transition from authoritarianism was completed, and priority was<br />
given to economic reforms2). Also, the assumption was not only that transition from democracy<br />
was complete, but also that, at this point in time, economic liberalization would already have<br />
190