FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
president the power to enact decrees on economic and financial matters, which have effect<br />
immediately. Temporary legislative decrees would be those that have immediate effect, but<br />
which require, for example, congressional approval after a certain period of time to become<br />
permanent laws. Such is the case of Brazilian ―provisional measures‖ of article 62 of the 1988<br />
Constitution and Argentinean ―need and urgency decrees‖ of article 99 of the 1994 Constitution.<br />
Latin American constitutions present examples of all kinds of presidential decree powers.<br />
One historical similarity is that such instruments were intimately related to the economic crises<br />
of the 1980s. The public demanded the executive to react quickly in face of hyperinflation and<br />
54).<br />
Another model of decree power exercised many times in Latin America might be described as supra-constitutional<br />
decree power. Many decrees had no constitutional grounding and were implemented based on the prestige of the<br />
president and in the mist of economic crises and institutional disarrangement. I will not discuss such model here<br />
because it would demand a more detailed evaluation of individual decrees and specific constitutional systems. See<br />
John M. Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, Calling Out the Tanks or Filing Out the Forms?, in E<br />
XECUTIVE DECREE A UTHORITY 1-29, 14 (John M. Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, Eds.,<br />
Cambridge University Press, 1998).<br />
Page 24<br />
massive unemployment. As a result, many new Constitutions, which were supposed to represent<br />
the transition from authoritarianism, also maintained or expanded mechanism of executive<br />
legislative authority. Even in those countries where such mechanisms were not restricted to<br />
economic policies, decrees were overwhelmingly used to implement economic reforms. Brazil is<br />
an extreme case. Between 1989 and 1997, about 86% of all ―provisional measures‖ were related<br />
to economic policy. 55).<br />
In Argentina most ―need and urgency decrees‖ were also related to<br />
stabilization plans and market reforms. Particularly before such mechanisms were regulated by<br />
the 1994 Constitution, such decrees were a result of delegation by Congress, such as in the case<br />
of the 1989 Administrative Emergency Act and Economic Emergency Act. Such acts gave the<br />
president broad powers to regulate privatizations; trade and financial liberalization; monetary<br />
deregulation; and fiscal and tax reforms. During the first presidency of Carlos Menem, from<br />
1989 to 1995, about 58% of all legislative activity was based on ―need and emergency<br />
decrees‖ 56).<br />
; in a clear illustration of executive supremacy.<br />
In the context of this paper, the executive power to legislate has three problems. First, it<br />
generates imbalances between powers. The second problem, more directly related to the main<br />
concerns of this paper, is that, theoretically, broad executive decree authority increases the<br />
possibility of corruption, once the president can freely negotiate rent-seeking opportunities.<br />
However, I believe that the worst effect is that it increases the perception of corruption. It makes<br />
easier for the government to implement policies that have negative distributive effects, once the<br />
president does not have to deal with opposing parties and interest groups representing those<br />
suffering the burdens of reforms. Even if there is no actual corruption, the negative distributive<br />
55). See Argelina Figueiredo and Fernando Limongi, Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and<br />
Partu Behavior in the Legislature, 32 C OMPARATIVE P OLITICS 115, 146 (2000).<br />
56). See Gabriel L. Negretto, Government Capacities and Policy Making by Decree in Latin America: The<br />
Cases of Brazil and Argentina, 37 C OMPARATIVE P OLITICAL S TUDIES 531, 553 (2004).<br />
Page 25<br />
effects of such policies, coupled with its autocratic mechanisms of implementation, increase the<br />
sense of unfairness and distrust in society, increasing also the perception of corruption. As<br />
argued before, considering that perception of corruption and income inequality are correlated,<br />
preserving presidential authority to legislate only nurtures the vicious circle. Nonetheless, only<br />
transferring power from the president to Congress may not help reduce the perception of<br />
201