FILSAFAT KORUPSI - Direktori File UPI

135
theories might explain why social integration would reduce corruption. Of these, most would seem likely to
predict a negative correlation between social integration and transfer frequency (eg., Hypotheses 1, 2 and
3). It is harder to tell stories which, like Hypothesis 4, predict a positive rela-tionship. Thus, examining the
relationship between social integration and transfer frequency enables us to see how social integration
affects the level of corruption. Table I investigates the cross-sectional relationship between social
integration (proxied by a low level of riots) and transfer frequency. Overall, it appears that, using either
measure of riotousness, in states with a low level of riots, transfer frequency is higher. The explanation
33
Page 35
Table I Determinants of A vera ge Transfer Frequency (λ)Crosssection (OLS, const ants not shown)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
l
n
(
R
iots-A
)
-0.061
-0.034
-0.062
-0.035
-0.036
(2.22)
(2.01)
(2.16)
(2.14)
(1.83)
R
iots-B
-0.280
-0.200
-0.226
(4.27)
(2.34)
(2.52)
l
n
(
I
ncome
)
-0.157
-0.152
-0.118
(1.16)
(1.16)