27.04.2013 Views

10. Appendix

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Solution to Problem 2.20 597<br />

to the higher energy plane wave states. However, for the purpose of demonstrating<br />

the symmetry of the L wave functions the present approximation is<br />

adequate.<br />

Based on the above assumption, the only pseudopotential form factor<br />

which couples „1 and „2 is: Vg V s 3<br />

cos(g · s) from (2.33) where the vec-<br />

tors g (2apple/a)(1, 1, 1) and s (a/8)(1, 1, 1). Notice that in arriving at (2.33)<br />

we have chosen the origin to be at the mid-point between the two atoms in the<br />

diamond lattice. We note also that the symmetric pseudopotential form factor<br />

Vs 3 is negative for all diamond and zincblende-type semiconductors (see Table<br />

2.21) because of the attractive nature of the potential seen by the electrons.<br />

Thus Vg Vs 3 cos(g · s) Vs 3 cos(3apple/4) (1/√2)Vs 3 is 0.<br />

To calculate the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions we will set up the usual<br />

determinant:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2k2 E Vg<br />

2m<br />

V∗ <br />

g<br />

2k2 <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

and diagonalize it.<br />

<br />

E <br />

2m<br />

The resultant energies are: E± [2k2 /2m] ±|Vg| where [2k2 /2m] ± Vg.<br />

The corresponding wave functions are given by: (1/2) 1/2 [„1 „2].<br />

For the valence band we have to take the lower energy solution: „v <br />

C1„1 C2„2. Substituting back EV E into the linear equation for C1 and<br />

C2 we get:<br />

{[2k2 /2m] E}C1 VgC2 0orVgC1 VgC2 0.<br />

Since Vg is 0, we obtain: C1 C2. Thus „V (1/2) 1/2 [„1 „2] or the valence<br />

band has odd parity under inversion operation I and hence its symmetry<br />

is L2 ′.<br />

(b) To calculate the bonding and anti-bonding s-orbitals within the tightbinding<br />

approximation we will further simplify the results contained in 2.7.2.<br />

First, we neglect the overlap between the s- and p-orbitals. This has the effect<br />

of reducing the 8 × 8 matrix in Table 2.25 into a 2 × 2 matrix for the s-orbitals<br />

and a 6×6 matrix for the p-orbitals. The effect of this simplification will affect<br />

the accuracy of the bonding and anti-bonding orbital energies but should not<br />

change their parity. Within this approximation there are only 2 orbitals: |S1〉<br />

and |S2〉 corresponding to the s-orbitals of the two atoms inside the primitive<br />

unit cell. The secular equations for their eigenvalues (as obtained from Table<br />

2.25) are now:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Es<br />

<br />

Ek Vssg1<br />

<br />

<br />

0<br />

Vssg ∗ 1<br />

Es Ek<br />

According to (2.82a) the factor<br />

g1 (1/4) exp[i(d1 · k)] exp[i(d2 · k)]<br />

exp[i(d3 · k)] exp[i(d4 · k)] <br />

cos(k1apple/2) cos(k2apple/2) cos(k3apple/2) i sin(k1apple/2) sin(k2apple/2) sin(k3apple/2) ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!