10. Appendix
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ùm<br />
∞<br />
NLOq<br />
0<br />
2 apple<br />
dq<br />
0<br />
∞<br />
Solution to Problem 5.5 629<br />
where P(k, k ′ ) is the probability per unit time for the electron to be scattered<br />
from the initial state k to the final state k ′ . The summation over k ′ can be<br />
converted into an integration over q by invoking wave vector conservation. In<br />
the case of scattering by LO phonons the expression for PLO is then given by<br />
(5.48). The corresponding expression for (k/Ùm) then becomes:<br />
<br />
k<br />
q<br />
∝<br />
d cos £<br />
2<br />
(q2 q2 0 )<br />
<br />
q cos £‰(Ek ′ (Ek ELO))<br />
<br />
·<br />
0<br />
apple<br />
0<br />
(NLO 1)q 2 dq<br />
<br />
q<br />
d cos £<br />
2<br />
(q2 q2 0 )<br />
<br />
(q cos £)‰(Ek ′ (Ek ELO))<br />
To eliminate the integration over cos £ one notes that the ‰-functions can be<br />
written as:<br />
and<br />
‰[Ek ′ (Ek ELO)] (2m ∗ / 2 )‰[(2kq cos £ q 2 ) (2m ∗ / 2 )ELO]<br />
‰[Ek ′ (Ek ELO)] (2m ∗ / 2 )‰[(2kq cos £ q 2 ) (2m ∗ / 2 )ELO]<br />
After integration over cos £, one eliminates the delta functions and obtains:<br />
k<br />
Ùm<br />
∝<br />
q1max<br />
q1min<br />
<br />
NLO dq q 2m∗ELO 2 <br />
<br />
q<br />
q2max<br />
q2min<br />
<br />
(NLO 1) dq q 2m∗ELO 2 <br />
q<br />
Using the results from (a) and (b) for the limits of integration, we can perform<br />
the integration over q. The above results have been obtained under the<br />
assumption that the screening wave vector q0 can be set to zero. This assumption<br />
is valid when q1min and q2min are both larger than q0 or if the concentration<br />
of electrons is low. [Note that in case of scattering by acoustic phonons<br />
via the piezoelectric interaction it is impossible to neglect q0 since the minimum<br />
value of q is zero]. For LO phonons we have shown that both q1min and<br />
q2min can never be zero (except in the limit Ek ⇒∞) so this problem will<br />
not arise. To obtain (5.51) we have to perform the integration and put in the<br />
appropriate limits in the above expression. The result is:<br />
1<br />
∝ NLO<br />
Ùm<br />
<br />
q 2 1max q2 1min<br />
(NLO 1)<br />
k 2<br />
ELO<br />
Ek<br />
ln<br />
q1max<br />
<br />
q1min<br />
<br />
q2 2max q2 2min<br />
k2 ELO<br />
<br />
q2max<br />
ln<br />
Ek q2min