27.04.2013 Views

10. Appendix

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

642 <strong>Appendix</strong> B<br />

How to explain a Positive Eg/T?<br />

We note that the above approach based on a second-order perturbation treatment<br />

of electron-phonon interaction tends to predict a decrease in Eg with<br />

increase in T. Clearly a different approach is necessary to explain the increase<br />

in Eg with T observed experimentally in the lead chalcogenides (even after<br />

deduction of the effect of thermal expansion) . This approach has been proposed<br />

by Antončik [E. Antončik, Czech. J. Phys. 5, 449 (1955)]. The main idea<br />

of this approach is that one starts with the pseudopotential method for calculating<br />

the energy gap Eg at T 0 (to be more precise, with the atoms at rest,<br />

so as to avoid quantum-mechanical zero-point vibrations) and then calculates<br />

Eg(T) from the temperature dependent pseudopotential form factors Vg. Let<br />

us assume that we define the T 0 pseudopotential form factors by (2.25):<br />

Vg(0) 1<br />

<br />

V(r) exp[ig · r]dr<br />

ø ø<br />

At T 0 we would expect that both V(r) and the unit cell volume ø would<br />

change with T. Again, we neglect the effect of thermal expansion on the lattice<br />

constant so ø remains unchanged. Under this assumption the effect of T<br />

is simply to cause the atoms to vibrate with amplitude ¢R(t) about the T 0<br />

equilibrium position R0. In principle, this vibration will cause V to be a function<br />

of time t and hence Vg also becomes time dependent. Since the period<br />

of atomic vibration is typically much shorter than the time of measurement<br />

of Eg in an experiment, Eg can be assumed to depend on the time-averaged<br />

pseudopotential 〈V〉 only. It is not easy to calculate this average 〈V〉 since we<br />

do not know how V will change as a result of the atomic vibration. Even if<br />

we can assume that the ion cores vibrate as a rigid body there is no reason to<br />

assume that the charge distribution of the valence electrons will rigidly follow<br />

the ion cores. One way to understand this is to think of what happens when<br />

we shake an egg. The egg yolk will not necessarily follow the shell rigidly.<br />

For simplicity, one can assume that the whole atom, including all the valence<br />

electrons, will vibrate as a rigid body. This means that when the atom moves<br />

from R0 to R0 ¢R(t) the pseudopotential changes from V to V ′ where V ′<br />

is related to V simply by a displacement of the coordinate system by ¢R(t).<br />

If we define a new coordinate system so that the origin is displaced by ¢R(t)<br />

and a point r in the old system becomes: r ′ r ¢R in the new system then<br />

V ′ (r ′ ) V(r). The new pseudopotential form factor Vg(T) is given by:<br />

Vg(T) 1<br />

<br />

V<br />

ø ø<br />

′ (r) exp[ig · r]dr<br />

1<br />

<br />

V(r<br />

ø ø<br />

′ ) exp[ig · (r ′ ¢R)dr ′<br />

<br />

[exp ig · ¢R]<br />

V(r<br />

ø<br />

′ ) exp[ig · r ′ ]dr ′<br />

ø

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!