27.04.2013 Views

10. Appendix

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

644 <strong>Appendix</strong> B<br />

Solution to Problem 6.21<br />

The ratio ¢0/¢1 in Table 6.2 is not close to 3/2 for the two compounds GaN<br />

and InP. To understand why the ratio of the spin-orbit (S-O) splittings deviates<br />

from 3/2 for these compounds we have to find the reason why this ratio should<br />

be equal to 3/2 in the first place. Quantum mechanics teaches us that the S-O<br />

coupling is a relativistic effect described by the Hamiltonian: (see (2.45a)):<br />

HSO [/4c 2 m 2 ][(∇Vxp) · Û]<br />

Where V is the potential seen by the electron, p and Û are, respectively, the<br />

electron momentum operators and the Pauli spin matrices. In atoms the nuclear<br />

potential has spherical symmetry so one can express the S-O coupling in<br />

terms of the electron orbital angular momentum operator L and spin operator<br />

S as:<br />

HSO ÏL · S<br />

where Ï is known as the S-O coupling constant. In cubic semiconductors with<br />

the zincblende and diamond structure we find that the top valence band wave<br />

functions at k 0 are “p-like”. As a result we can “treat” these wave functions<br />

as if they were eigenfunction of L with eigenvalue L 1. Within this<br />

model, we can define a total angular momentum operator J L S. Following<br />

the results of atomic physics we symmetrize the k 0 valence band<br />

wave functions to correspond to J 3/2 and J 1/2. Using the relation that<br />

L · S (1/2)[J 2 L 2 S 2 ] we can show that:<br />

〈J 3/2|HSO|J 3/2〉 Ï/2 while 〉J 1/2|HSO|J 1/2〉 Ï.<br />

The S-O splitting ¢0 given by the separation between the J 3/2 and 1/2<br />

states is, therefore, 3Ï/2. In atoms the parameter Ï depends on the atomic orbitals<br />

involved. In crystals, we have pointed out on p. 59 that the conduction<br />

and valence band wave functions contain two parts: a smooth plane-wave like<br />

part which is called the pseudo-wave function and an oscillatory part which<br />

is localized mainly in the core region. Since HSO depends on ∇V most of<br />

the contribution to Ï comes from the oscillatory part of the wave function.<br />

Hence we expect that HSO in a semiconductor will depend on the S-O coupling<br />

of the core states (p and d states only since s states do not have S-O<br />

coupling) of its constituent atoms. In the cases of atoms with several p and<br />

d core states, the outermost occupied states are expected to make the biggest<br />

contribution to Ï of the conduction and valence bands. This is because the<br />

deeper core states tend to be screened more and hence contribute less to<br />

the valence and conduction electrons. For example, in Ge atoms the deep 2p,<br />

3d and 3p cores states all have larger S-O constants than the outermost 4p<br />

state. However, most of the S-O interaction in the valence band of Ge crystal<br />

at k 0 comes from the 4p atomic state. For the diamond-type semiconductors,<br />

such as Si and Ge, one may expect that S-O coupling in the crystal<br />

is related to the S-O coupling of the outermost occupied atomic p states

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!