10. Appendix
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
644 <strong>Appendix</strong> B<br />
Solution to Problem 6.21<br />
The ratio ¢0/¢1 in Table 6.2 is not close to 3/2 for the two compounds GaN<br />
and InP. To understand why the ratio of the spin-orbit (S-O) splittings deviates<br />
from 3/2 for these compounds we have to find the reason why this ratio should<br />
be equal to 3/2 in the first place. Quantum mechanics teaches us that the S-O<br />
coupling is a relativistic effect described by the Hamiltonian: (see (2.45a)):<br />
HSO [/4c 2 m 2 ][(∇Vxp) · Û]<br />
Where V is the potential seen by the electron, p and Û are, respectively, the<br />
electron momentum operators and the Pauli spin matrices. In atoms the nuclear<br />
potential has spherical symmetry so one can express the S-O coupling in<br />
terms of the electron orbital angular momentum operator L and spin operator<br />
S as:<br />
HSO ÏL · S<br />
where Ï is known as the S-O coupling constant. In cubic semiconductors with<br />
the zincblende and diamond structure we find that the top valence band wave<br />
functions at k 0 are “p-like”. As a result we can “treat” these wave functions<br />
as if they were eigenfunction of L with eigenvalue L 1. Within this<br />
model, we can define a total angular momentum operator J L S. Following<br />
the results of atomic physics we symmetrize the k 0 valence band<br />
wave functions to correspond to J 3/2 and J 1/2. Using the relation that<br />
L · S (1/2)[J 2 L 2 S 2 ] we can show that:<br />
〈J 3/2|HSO|J 3/2〉 Ï/2 while 〉J 1/2|HSO|J 1/2〉 Ï.<br />
The S-O splitting ¢0 given by the separation between the J 3/2 and 1/2<br />
states is, therefore, 3Ï/2. In atoms the parameter Ï depends on the atomic orbitals<br />
involved. In crystals, we have pointed out on p. 59 that the conduction<br />
and valence band wave functions contain two parts: a smooth plane-wave like<br />
part which is called the pseudo-wave function and an oscillatory part which<br />
is localized mainly in the core region. Since HSO depends on ∇V most of<br />
the contribution to Ï comes from the oscillatory part of the wave function.<br />
Hence we expect that HSO in a semiconductor will depend on the S-O coupling<br />
of the core states (p and d states only since s states do not have S-O<br />
coupling) of its constituent atoms. In the cases of atoms with several p and<br />
d core states, the outermost occupied states are expected to make the biggest<br />
contribution to Ï of the conduction and valence bands. This is because the<br />
deeper core states tend to be screened more and hence contribute less to<br />
the valence and conduction electrons. For example, in Ge atoms the deep 2p,<br />
3d and 3p cores states all have larger S-O constants than the outermost 4p<br />
state. However, most of the S-O interaction in the valence band of Ge crystal<br />
at k 0 comes from the 4p atomic state. For the diamond-type semiconductors,<br />
such as Si and Ge, one may expect that S-O coupling in the crystal<br />
is related to the S-O coupling of the outermost occupied atomic p states