136 Humic acid (g.L -1 ) Table (3) Effect of Humic acid and Seaweed extract on Fruit weight (g.), Fruit length (cm.) and Yield/Plant (kg.) of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cv. Carol. 0.0 1 2 Mean effect of seaweed 0.0 89.81 c 95.86 be 98.39 a-c 94.68 b seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) Fruit weight (g.) Mean Effect <strong>Of</strong> Humic seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) Fruit length (cm.) Mean Effect of Humic seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) 2 3 0.0 2 3 0.0 2 3 102.95 a-c 96.45 be 105.67 ab 101.69 ab 104.59 ab 108.16 ab 110.84 a 107.86 a 99.11 a 100.16 a 104.96 a 15.17 b 16.67 ab 16.29 ab 16.04 b Mean within a column, row and their interaction following with the same latter are not significantly different according to Duncan multiple range test at the probability of 0.05 level 17.17 a 17.00 a 17.62 a 16.83 a 17.00 a 17.80 a 16.39 a 16.89 a 17.24 a 5.93 d 7.57 be 8.46 ab 7.16 c 8.73 a 8.79 a Yield /Plant (kg.) Table (4):- Effect of Humic acid and Seaweed extract on Fruit dry weight (g), Fruit Chlorophyll content% and TSS% of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cv. Carol. Humic acid (g.L -1 ) 0.0 1 2 Mean effect of Seaweed 0.0 2.70 d 3.13 be 2.94 cd 2.92 b Fruit dry weight (g) Seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) Mean Effect of Humic 2 2.97 cd 3.10 be 3.02 cd 3.03 b 3 2.94 cd 3.39 ab 3.53 a 3.28 a 2.87 b 3.20 a 3.16 a 0.0 30.93 b 34.93 a 37.63 a 34.50 b 17.26 a 17.21 a Fruit Chlorophyll content% Seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) Mean Effect of Humic 2 37.60 a 37.33 a 3 37.63 35.39 a b 35.63 a 35.97 ab 7.32 b 0.0 2.70 b 3.23 ab 8.23 a 7.51 be 8.79 a 9.49 a 8.60 a TSS% Mean Effect <strong>Of</strong> Humic 6.87 c 8.37 b 8.91 a Seaweed extract (ml.L -1 ) Mean Effect <strong>Of</strong> Humic Mean within a column, row and their interaction following with the same latter are not significantly different according to Duncan multiple range test at the probability of 0.05 level 37.17 a 37.37 a 37.30 a 36.86 a 37.37 a 3.47 a 3.13 a 2 3.13 ab 3.20 ab 3.67 a 3.33 a 3 3.33 a 3.43 a 3.40 a 3.38 a 3.06 b 3.29 ab 3.56` a J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri. And Vet. Sciences) Pp 131-139, 2010
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri. And Vet. Sciences) Pp 131-138, 2010 REFERENCES -Abolina, B.I. and Tashkhadzhaev, A.T. (1968). Effects of Coal-Humic Fertilizers on the Activity of Physiological Processes in Plants and in the Yield of Potatoes in Uzbekistan. Guminovye Udabr. -Aitken, J. and Senn T. (1965).seaweed products as a fertilizer and soil conditioner. Botanica Marina 8. P: 144. -AL- Niemi, S.N.A.(1999). Fertilizers and soil fertility Dar- AL- kutub publication. Mosul Univ. Iraq (in Arabic). -Al- Saaberi M. R. S. (2005). Effect of Some Agricultural Treatments on Growth, Yield of Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.) MSC <strong>The</strong>sis Horticulture Sciences University of Mosul College of Agriculture and Forestry. -Ali, N., M. Kafi, M. Babalar, Y. Xia, A. Luo and N. Etemadi. (2008). Effect of Humic Acid on Plant Growth, Nutrient Uptake, and Postharvest Life of Gerbera Journal of plant nutrition, Volume 31, Issue 12 December 2008 , pages 2155 – 2167 (Abstract). -Chen, Y. and T. Aviad, (1990). Effects of humic substances on plant growth. p.161-186 In P. MacCarthy, C.E. Clapp, R.L. Malcolm, and P.R. Bloom (Eds.). Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings. Am Soc. <strong>Of</strong> Agronomy and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am, Madison, WI. -Donnell, R.W. ,1973. <strong>The</strong> auxin-like effects of humic preparations from leonardite. Soil Sci.116 (2):106- 112.Freeman, P.S. (1970). <strong>The</strong> Use of Lignite Products as Plant Growth Stimulants. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Grand Forks, ND. USA. -Freeman, P.S. (1970). <strong>The</strong> Use of Lignite Products as Plant Growth Stimulants. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Grand Forks, ND. USA. -Giuseppe, F., A. Pacifico, P. Simeone and E. Ferrara. 2006. Preliminary study on the effects of foliar applications of humic acids on Italla, Tabble grape Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Vegetali, University of Bari via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari. -Gollan, J.R. and J.T. Wright (2006). Limited grazing by native herbivores on the invasive seaweed caulerpa. Taxi folia in a temperate. Australia estuary marine and fresh water Research . 57(7):685-694. -Hafez, M.M. (2004). Effect of some sources of Nitrogen fertilizer and concentration of humic acid on the productivity of squash plant. Egypt. J. Appli. Sci. 19 : 293-309. -Jensen, E. (2004) Seaweed ; fact or fancy . from the organic broad caster, published by Moses the Midwest organic and Sustainable Education. From the broad caster. 12(3): 164-170. -Kowalski, B.,A.K. Jager and J. Vanstaden (1999). <strong>The</strong> effect of seaweed concentrate on the invitro growth and Acclimatization of the potato plants . potato Research. 42(1): 131-139. -Lee, Y.S. and R.J. Bartlette (1976). Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances. Soil Sci., Soc. Amer. J. 40: 876-879. -Manuel, A., F. Fornes, D. García, J. Cegarra and A. Roig. 1991. Effects of humic substances from different sources on growth and nutrient content of cucumber plants ISBN978-3-540-53702-1Volume 33/199 pages 1391-396 (Abstract). -Matlob, A.N.; E. Sultan, and K.S. Abdul (1989). Vegetable production part one and two. Dar Al-Kutub publication. Mosul Univ. Iraq. (in Arabic). -Onder, T., A. Dursun, M. Turan, C. Erdinc. 2004. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth, and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Volume 54, Issue 3 August 2004, pages 168 – 174 (Abstract). -Salman, S.R., S.D. Abou-hussein, A.M.R. Abdel- Mawgoud and M.A. El-Nemr. 2004. Fruit Yield and Quality of Watermelon as Affected by Hybrids and Humic Acid Application Department of Vegetable Research, National Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 1(1): 51-58, 2005 -SAS (2001). SAS/STAT 'User's Guide for Personal Computer. Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC., USA. -Syabryai, V.T., V.A. Reutov and L.M. Vigdergauz (1965). Preparation of Humic Fertilizers From Brown Geol. Zh., Akad. Nauk Ukr. RSR 25: 39- 47. -Thomas,S. C. L. (1996) Nutrient weeds as soil Amendments for Organic Cally Growth Herbs. J. of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plant. 4 (1): 3-8. -Thomas, S. C. L. (2002). Production Development of sea buckthorn. L., ,T. S. C. product Development of sea buckthorn P. 393-398. In J.Janik and A. whipke (Eds) Trendsin new crops and new uses ASHS, Alexandria, VA -Zhang, X. and R.E. Schmidt, 2000. Hormone- containing products impact on antioxidant status of tall fescue and creeping bent grass subject to drought. Crop Sci. 40: 1344-1349. -Zhang, X., E.H. Ervin and R.E. Schmidt, 2003a. Plant growth regulators can enhance the recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from heat injury. Crop Sci. 43: 952-956. -Zhang, X., E.H. Ervin and R.E. Schmidt, 2003b. Physiological effects of liquid applications of a seaweed extract and a humic acid on creeping bent grass. J. Amer. Hort. Sci. 128: 492-496. -Zhang, X. and E.H. Ervin, 2004. Cytokinin- containing seaweed and humic acid extracts associated with creeping bent grass leaf cytokinins and drought resistance. Crop Sci. 44: 1737-1745 137
- Page 1 and 2:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 3 and 4:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 5 and 6:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 7 and 8:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 9 and 10:
Cultiva tion metho ds and cvs (A*B)
- Page 11 and 12:
Indirect cultivation Cultivation me
- Page 13 and 14:
Dir ect cul tiv ati on J. Duhok Uni
- Page 15 and 16:
Cultivation methods and cvs (A*B) J
- Page 17 and 18:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 19 and 20:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 21 and 22:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 23 and 24:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 25 and 26:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 27 and 28:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 29 and 30:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 31 and 32:
25% water 50% water media ×p J. Du
- Page 33 and 34:
25% water 50% water media ×p J. Du
- Page 35 and 36:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 37 and 38:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 39 and 40:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 41 and 42:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 43 and 44:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 45 and 46:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 47 and 48:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 49 and 50:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 51 and 52:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 53 and 54:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 55 and 56:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 57 and 58:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 59 and 60:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 61 and 62:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 63 and 64:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 65 and 66:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 67 and 68:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 69 and 70:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 71 and 72:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 73 and 74:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 75 and 76:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 77 and 78:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 79 and 80:
44 Hybrids 2 A 2 D 2 E 2 H 2 h a
- Page 81 and 82:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 83 and 84:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 85 and 86:
J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 87 and 88: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 89 and 90: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 91 and 92: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 93 and 94: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 95 and 96: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 97 and 98: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 99 and 100: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 101 and 102: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 103 and 104: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 105 and 106: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 107 and 108: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 109 and 110: 601 Inreed line 1 59.00 ef 2 63.66
- Page 111 and 112: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 113 and 114: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 115 and 116: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 117 and 118: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 119 and 120: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 121 and 122: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 123 and 124: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 125 and 126: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 127 and 128: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 129 and 130: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 131 and 132: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 133 and 134: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 135 and 136: 133 Table (1):- Effect of Humic aci
- Page 137: 135 Humic acid (g.L -1 ) 0.0 1 2 Me
- Page 141 and 142: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 143 and 144: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 145 and 146: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 147 and 148: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 149 and 150: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 151 and 152: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 153 and 154: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 155 and 156: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 157 and 158: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 159 and 160: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 161 and 162: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 163 and 164: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 165 and 166: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 167 and 168: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 169 and 170: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 171 and 172: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 173 and 174: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 175 and 176: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.
- Page 177: J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri.