21.05.2013 Views

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri. And Vet. Sciences) Pp 49-54, 2010<br />

05<br />

CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Carcass characteristic of different treatment<br />

groups of Meriz are presented in Table (2). Hot<br />

and chilled carcass weights averaged 8.50 ± 0.55<br />

and 8.19 ± 0.54 kg, respectively. Yet, the<br />

difference among treatment groups was not<br />

significant. However Abd El-Monem et al<br />

(2008) observed an improvement of hot carcass<br />

weight when growing lambs treated with the<br />

ascorbic acid at all rates of 500,750 and 1000 mg<br />

per kg diet.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average dressing percentage based on<br />

full and empty body weight was 42.26 ± 0.63<br />

and 48.75 ± 0.76 %, respectively. Also,<br />

statistical analyses revealed that supplementation<br />

of vitamin C had no significant effect on this<br />

trait. <strong>The</strong> dressing percentages obtained in this<br />

study were lower than those reported by Mayi<br />

(2009) for Meriz goat slaughtered at a heavier<br />

weight (25.8 kg), but it is higher than those<br />

observed by Dosky (2010) for the same breed<br />

raised either intensively or semi intensively or in<br />

pasture.<br />

Percent shrinkage averaged 3.71 ± 0.30 %<br />

(Table 2). However, the differences among<br />

treatment groups were not significant. Similarly,<br />

Mayi (2009) and Dosky (2010) indicated that<br />

shrinkage percentage averaged 3.47 and 4.05 %<br />

for Meriz carcasses. <strong>The</strong> greater loss in weight<br />

due to chilling of Meriz can be possibly<br />

attributed to their thinner subcutaneous fat cover<br />

( Table 2).<br />

THE RIB EYE AREA AND THE FAT<br />

THICKNESS<br />

In the present work, result showed that rib<br />

eye area averaged 6.60 ± 0.46cm 2 (Table 2). No<br />

significant differences were observed between<br />

control and other treatments in this trait. While,<br />

Abd El-Monem et al (2008) indicated that eye<br />

muscle weight was improved when growing<br />

lambs treated with ascorbic acid at all the rates<br />

of 500, 750, and 1000 mg per kg diets. Also,<br />

goat carcasses had a very thin layer of<br />

subcutaneous fat (0.78 ± 0.05 mm) (Table 2). A<br />

typical feature of goat carcasses in their thin fat<br />

cover (Colomer-Rocher et al. 1992; Dhanda et<br />

al. 2003), Control treatment had thinner fat over<br />

eye muscle numerically (0.68 ± 0.079mm)<br />

compared to other treatments (0.90 ± 0.11, 0.70<br />

± 0.05 and 0.84 ± 0.14mm), respectively (Table<br />

2), yet, the differences were not significant.<br />

Similarly, working with pigs, it was reported that<br />

dietary vitamin E and C supplementation to pigs<br />

resulted in a non-significant effect on carcass<br />

characteristics (% Lean cut, % fat tissue and fat<br />

thickness) (Eichenberger et al., 2004). In<br />

general, the value of both fat thickness and rib<br />

eye area obtained in the current investigation is<br />

lower than those reported by Mayi(2009) for<br />

Meriz goat slaughtered at a heaver weight but it<br />

is higher than those noted by Dosky (2010) for<br />

the same breed.<br />

Table (2):- Effect of supplementation of vitamin C on fattening performance and carcass traits (Mean ± s.e).<br />

Trait Overall mean Treatment<br />

Control 750 mg 1000 mg 1250 mg<br />

No. animals 5 5 5 5<br />

Final wt (kg) 19.92 ± 1.10 19.48 ± 2.04 a 20.54 ± 1.39 a 19.88 ± 2.46 a 19.78 ± 2.67 a<br />

Empty body wt.<br />

(kg)<br />

17.30 ± 0.98 16.98± 1.87 a 17.70± 1.35 a 17.38± 2.08 a 17.16± 2.39 a<br />

Hot carcass wt.<br />

(kg)<br />

8.50 ± 0.55 8.32± 1.14 a 8.62± 0.56 a 8.50± 1.20 a 8.58± 1.35 a<br />

Chilled carcass<br />

wt(kg)<br />

Dressing %<br />

8.19 ± 0.54 8.02± 1.10 a 8.32± 0.60 a 8.20± 1.15 a 8.24± 1.32 a<br />

1 42.26 ± 0.63 41.94± 1.89 a 41.98± 0.39 a 42.34± 1.16 a 42.78± 1.20 a<br />

2 48.75 ± 0.76 48.30± 2.03 a 48.86± 0.91 a 48.35± 1.18 a 49.49± 1.71 a<br />

Shrinkage % 3.71 ± 0.30 3.63± 0.71 a 3.59± 0.72 a 3.52± 0.31 a 4.10± 0.56 a<br />

Fat thickness<br />

(mm)<br />

Rib-eye area<br />

(cm 2 )<br />

0.78 ± 0.05 0.68± 0.079 a 0.90± 0.11 a 0.70± 0.05 a 0.84± 0.14 a<br />

6.60 ± 0.46 6.40± 0.92 a 6.60± 0.40 a 7.20± 1.39 a 6.20± 0.66 a<br />

Means with different letters within each row differ significantly.<br />

(1): Based on slaughter weight.<br />

(2): Based on empty body weight.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!