21.05.2013 Views

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri. And Vet. Sciences) Pp 153-161, 2010<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Studies of Caprine anaplasmosis in Iraq are<br />

very scare and little information had been<br />

provided. This preliminary study was done for<br />

the first time in Duhok area, North Iraq from<br />

April to September, 2009. Accordingly, the<br />

objective of this study was determine the<br />

prevalence of Caprine anaplasmosis (A. ovis ).<br />

For the detection of A. ovis infection, two<br />

methods were used. <strong>The</strong> first one was based on<br />

microscopical examination of Giemsa stained<br />

blood smear, and the second technique cELISA,<br />

was used for detection of antibodies in sera of<br />

the investigated animals.<br />

Microscopic examination of the Giemsa<br />

stained thin blood smears is still the most<br />

reliable and cost effective method of confirming<br />

a clinical diagnosis of anaplasmosis (De Waal,<br />

2000). <strong>The</strong> diagnosis of tick borne diseases such<br />

as babesiosis, theleriosis and anaplasmosis still<br />

depends on observing the parasities in the<br />

infected erythrocytes when the parasitemia rates<br />

are indicative. Although the parasite detection<br />

can be easily applied in the field, the sensitivity<br />

of the method and its failure to detect<br />

anaplasmosis, if the number of parasite in the<br />

peripheral blood is too low, illustrate the<br />

limitation of parasitological diagnosis by Giemsa<br />

stained blood smears (Soulsby, 1986).<br />

In the present study, the prevalence of A. ovis<br />

by Giemsa stained blood smears was high<br />

revealed that 257(55.86%) in compared with<br />

other studies was done in Iraq. Alsaad et al.<br />

(2009) found the prevalence of A. ovis in goats<br />

in Mousl province in Iraq revealed that (24.74%)<br />

were infected with A. ovis. Al-Amerey and<br />

Hasso. (2002) reported that the prevalence of A.<br />

ovis in goats in Baghdad was 32.19%.While in<br />

other countries like Jordan, the prevalence of A.<br />

ovis by thin blood films was 8.6% in sheep and<br />

goats (Sherkov et al., 1976). Razmi et al. (2006)<br />

revealed that the rate 80.3% of sheep and<br />

38.92% of goats in Iran were infected with A.<br />

ovis by Giemsa stained blood smears. Talat et al.<br />

(2005) revealed that the incidence of A. ovis in<br />

sheep and goats in Pakistan was 13.2% and<br />

9.59% respectively and Hur et al. (1995) showed<br />

that the infection rate of grazing and nongrazing<br />

goats with Anaplasma spp. in Korean was 71.7<br />

and 8.5 %, respectively. Park et al., (1997) found<br />

that the infection rate of A. ovis in Korean goats<br />

by Giemsa stained blood smears and<br />

complement fixation test (CFT) was 20.1% and<br />

75.2% respectively, these variation in the rates<br />

might be related to distribution of population of<br />

the vectors as ticks and others like flies and<br />

mosquitoes.<br />

Microscopical examination revealed that<br />

presence of A. ovis in many erythrocytes with<br />

parasitemia ranged from 2.8- 12.2% with the<br />

mean value 7.16 ± 2.98 %, and the appearance of<br />

anaplasma inclusion bodies in the erythrocyte as<br />

spherical granule with variable from single to<br />

double dote like structure. <strong>The</strong>se shapes are<br />

similar to those described by Soulsby (1986).<br />

Razmi et al. (2006) found that the ranges of<br />

anaplasmatemia in the infected cattle, sheep and<br />

goats were 0.005-0.5%, 0.01-3% and 0.01-3%,<br />

respectively. Lu et al. (1997) revealed that the<br />

peak of parasitemia of erythrocytes in goats in<br />

China was 18-55.3%. Barry and Van Niekerk<br />

(1990) mentioned that showed that the mean<br />

parasitemia reached a peak of 5% to 6%, in boar<br />

goats with a maximum of 12% in two cases in<br />

South Africa. This variability in the parasitemia<br />

might to be due to variety of infection as acute<br />

or chronic and difference in strain of the agent<br />

and immune status of the host.<br />

<strong>The</strong> prevalence rate of Anaplasma ovis<br />

related to age groups and sex of goats was<br />

studied. <strong>The</strong>re was statistically difference in rate<br />

of prevalence between the sex and age groups<br />

(p 0.05); a high rate was found in age group<br />

above 3 years in comparison to other age groups.<br />

<strong>The</strong> younger animals less susceptible to<br />

infection than aged animals this might be due to<br />

passive immunization from dame to the kids via<br />

colostrums. <strong>The</strong> rate highly prevalently in<br />

females than males this might be due to the<br />

female animals kept involves in flocks more than<br />

male. This event was in agreement with<br />

Friedhoff (1997) and Lestoquard (1924), they<br />

found factors of age, sex, and breed influenced<br />

the incidence of anaplasma infection and the<br />

symptoms of the disease depended on age, the<br />

general condition of the animals and their breed<br />

(Shompole et al., 1989).<br />

Results agree with Alsaad (1990) reported<br />

that in Mosul province in Iraq the prevalence<br />

rate of A. marginale in cattle related to age,<br />

cattle from more than one year to four years old<br />

and those more than four years old were highly<br />

affected and represented the acute form of the<br />

disease with an infection rate of (60%, 22.5%)<br />

respectively, while cattle from 6-month to one<br />

year old were mildly affected and represented<br />

the mild form with an infection rate of 17.5%.<br />

Razmi et al. (2006) found that the prevalence<br />

of anaplasmosis was not statistically significant<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!