21.05.2013 Views

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

The Influence Of Priming Two Cucumber Cultivar Seeds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Duhok Univ. Vol.13, No.1, (Agri. And Vet. Sciences) Pp 90-93, 2010<br />

09<br />

THE ECONOMIES OF GOATS AND MERIZ KIDS MANAGED<br />

UNDER DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS<br />

KAMAL NOMAN DOSKY and REZGAR MOSTAFA MOHAMMED<br />

Dept. of Animal Production ,College of Agriculture, University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region-Iraq<br />

(Received: April 28, 2010; Accepted for publication: August 1, 2010)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

<strong>The</strong> objective of this study was to assess the economic benefit of kids of goat and Meriz managed under different<br />

feeding systems by using partial budget analysis. Twelve weaned kids from each of Meriz and native goat were<br />

divided into three different feeding systems (intensive, semi-intensive and extensive) for 90 days at the animal farm of<br />

the College of Agriculture, University of Duhok.<br />

A higher return ID (4759.22 and 5884 ) with marginal return (80.2%) and (58.8%) was achieved by Meriz and<br />

goat raised under semi-intensive systems compared with those managed under both intensive and pasture systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results revealed that goat raised under intensive system create losses compared with those raised either semiintensively<br />

or on pasture. Also, the present results indicate that Meriz raised intensively and semi-intensively<br />

significantly gained more weight than those raised extensively. However, the differences in gain in weight were not<br />

significant among different systems in goats.<br />

KEY WORDS: feeding system, Meriz, goat, partial budget analysis.<br />

G<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

oats are well adapted to the<br />

environmental and limited feed and<br />

utilize marginal land to produce high protein<br />

products (Kadim et al. 2003). <strong>The</strong> local goats<br />

with a population of 1.6 million head (FAO,<br />

2000) are important livestock species in Iraq;<br />

they can play important role for the provision of<br />

meat and milk, particularly under the agricultural<br />

systems prevailing in the country (Alkass and<br />

Juma, 2005).<br />

Since no information is available on the<br />

effect of different production system and breed<br />

of goat on the feasibility of rearing the animal,<br />

therefore this work was conducted to investigate<br />

the economic benefit of goats and Meriz<br />

managed under different feeding systems.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Twelve weaned kids (three months old) from<br />

each of Meriz and native Goat with an average<br />

initial weight 11.7±0.47 and 12.10±0.37 kg,<br />

respectively managed under three feeding<br />

system (intensive, semi intensive and pasture)<br />

were used in this study. Kids from each breed of<br />

first group were kept in individual boxes and had<br />

ad libitum access to concentrate (ingredients<br />

composition Barley 53%, Wheat bran 25%,<br />

Soybean meal 15%, Wheat straw 6%, Salts<br />

0.5%, Limestone 0.5% and Vitamins 0.5% ) and<br />

contained 16% crude protein. Drinking water<br />

was supplied ad libitum during the experiment of<br />

90 days. Kids of the second group (semi<br />

intensive) was left at the pasture for the first 45<br />

days of the experiment and then moved to the<br />

farm to be fed a concentrate mixture ad libitum<br />

for the rest of the experiment. <strong>The</strong> third group of<br />

kids was freely grazed at pasture. All kids were<br />

weighed biweekly after being fasted for 12hrs.<br />

Partial budget analysis was used to evaluate<br />

the economic advantage of different feeding<br />

system. Partial budgeting is a planning and<br />

decision-making framework used to compare the<br />

costs and benefits of alternatives faced by a farm<br />

business. It focuses only on the changes in<br />

income and expenses that would result from<br />

implementing a specific alternative. Thus, all<br />

aspects of farm profits that are unchanged by the<br />

decision can be safely ignored (Sarah and<br />

Jeffery, 2002). Partial budgeting measures<br />

profits (or losses) which are the net benefits or<br />

difference between gains and losses for the<br />

proposed change. Gains include added returns<br />

and reduced costs, losses include added costs<br />

and reduced returns. <strong>The</strong> method entails<br />

calculating net return (NR), i.e. the amount of<br />

money left when total variable costs (TVC) are<br />

subtracted from total returns (TR):<br />

NR = TR – TVC<br />

Total variable costs include the costs of all<br />

inputs that change due to the change in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!