27.07.2013 Views

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in <strong>the</strong> crystallization <strong>of</strong> fascism <strong>and</strong> communism as major political<br />

movements. In a brief but very instructive polemical dialogue, two<br />

prominent historians, Ernst Nolte <strong>and</strong> Francois Furet, credit <strong>the</strong> historico-genetic<br />

approach as being “more convincing,” “<strong>of</strong> greater interpretative<br />

force,” <strong>and</strong> “more interesting than <strong>the</strong> structural<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> Hitlerian <strong>and</strong> Stalinian totalitarianism” 28 but <strong>the</strong>y interpreted<br />

<strong>the</strong> inter-relationship between fascism <strong>and</strong> communism<br />

differently. Speculating on <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> Bolshevik revolution<br />

(1917) preceded <strong>the</strong> advent to power <strong>of</strong> National Socialism in Germany<br />

(1933), Nolte argued that “Fascism was born as a defensive<br />

reaction against communism,” 29 a view encapsulated in <strong>the</strong> catchy<br />

phrase “Without-Marxism-<strong>the</strong>re-is-no-fascism.” 30 In his view, Marxism<br />

was “an original movement, <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> very old roots,” while<br />

fascism was “a reaction <strong>of</strong> a secondary order, artificial in large part,<br />

based on postulates.” 31 On this basis, Nolte established a “causal<br />

nexus” between <strong>the</strong> Gulag system in USSR <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nazi Holocaust,<br />

seeing <strong>the</strong> second as a defensive reaction to <strong>the</strong> first. 32 This<br />

controversial <strong>the</strong>sis stirred a heated debate in Germany over <strong>the</strong><br />

uniqueness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holocaust <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> place <strong>of</strong> Nazism in German<br />

<strong>and</strong> European <strong>history</strong>, called <strong>the</strong> “historians’ quarrel” (Historikerstreit,<br />

1986-1989). The controversy started with a polemical exchange<br />

between Ernst Nolte <strong>and</strong> Jurgen Habermas, <strong>and</strong> was soon<br />

joined by major German <strong>and</strong> foreign historians. 33 During <strong>the</strong> debate,<br />

Nolte’s view on Nazism as a mere defensive reaction against<br />

Bolshevism was denounced as an attempt to shift <strong>the</strong> blame for<br />

27 A. James Gregor, “Fascism <strong>and</strong> Bolshevism,” in The Faces <strong>of</strong> Janus: Marxism<br />

<strong>and</strong> Fascism in <strong>the</strong> Twentieth Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University<br />

Press, 2000), 128-148.<br />

28 See <strong>the</strong> exchange between François Furet <strong>and</strong> Ernst Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong><br />

Communism, with a preface by Tzvetan Todorov (Lincoln: University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska<br />

Press. 2001), 33.<br />

29 These <strong>the</strong>ses were elaborated on in Ernst Nolte, Marxism, Fascism, Cold<br />

War (Atlantic Highl<strong>and</strong>s, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1982).<br />

30 Nolte, Three faces <strong>of</strong> fascism, 21.<br />

31 Furet, Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong> Communism, 25<br />

32 Furet, Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong> Communism, 27.<br />

33 See Forever in <strong>the</strong> shadow <strong>of</strong> Hitler? Original documents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Historikerstreit,<br />

<strong>the</strong> controversy concerning <strong>the</strong> singularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holocaust (Atlantic<br />

Highl<strong>and</strong>s, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1993). For a critical evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Historikerstreit,<br />

see Richard Evans, In Hitler’s Shadow: West German Historians<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Attempt to Escape <strong>the</strong> Nazi Past (New York, NY: Pan<strong>the</strong>on, 1989).<br />

139 Constantin Iordachi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!