Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The conference concentrated, as <strong>the</strong> title already suggests, on <strong>the</strong><br />
broader issue <strong>of</strong> national identity <strong>and</strong> its connections to <strong>the</strong> common<br />
<strong>past</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hungary <strong>and</strong> Slovakia. Some high level politicians from<br />
both countries were also participating in this event. We have printed<br />
below two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contributions that in our view give a fair representation<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> views expressed at <strong>the</strong> seminar, <strong>and</strong> one article<br />
that contains <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> a very interesting ‘historic’ opinion poll<br />
in Slovakia.<br />
There seems to be quite a gap between <strong>the</strong> more nationalist public<br />
expressions <strong>of</strong> politicians <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> moderate approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historians.<br />
Many Hungarian <strong>of</strong>ficials tend to idealize <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong> years<br />
<strong>of</strong> common Hungarian <strong>and</strong> Slovak <strong>history</strong>, while Slovaks <strong>of</strong>ten describe<br />
this period in terms <strong>of</strong> having been oppressed. Historians<br />
reject <strong>the</strong>se black <strong>and</strong> white interpretations that are <strong>use</strong>d to<br />
underpin <strong>the</strong> separate national identities. These concepts, <strong>the</strong>y say,<br />
were developed only after <strong>the</strong> abolition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feudal structures <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> old Hungary which were replaced by <strong>the</strong> civic concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
nation. To interpret <strong>the</strong> common <strong>history</strong> from before <strong>the</strong> 19 th century<br />
in <strong>the</strong>se terms is unhistorical. Only later statehood became <strong>the</strong><br />
vehicle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation <strong>and</strong> part <strong>of</strong> political <strong>history</strong>, which had <strong>and</strong> has<br />
a divisive impact. Recent historical studies that concentrate more<br />
on cultural <strong>and</strong> social <strong>history</strong> show that Hungarians <strong>and</strong> Slovaks<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten had a lot in common. The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mixed Committee <strong>of</strong><br />
Historians should certainly be continued beca<strong>use</strong> whatever <strong>the</strong><br />
merits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate, one thing we would like to emphasize is that<br />
indifference towards each o<strong>the</strong>rs histories is an unacceptable form<br />
<strong>of</strong> denial.<br />
170