27.07.2013 Views

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The conference concentrated, as <strong>the</strong> title already suggests, on <strong>the</strong><br />

broader issue <strong>of</strong> national identity <strong>and</strong> its connections to <strong>the</strong> common<br />

<strong>past</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hungary <strong>and</strong> Slovakia. Some high level politicians from<br />

both countries were also participating in this event. We have printed<br />

below two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contributions that in our view give a fair representation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> views expressed at <strong>the</strong> seminar, <strong>and</strong> one article<br />

that contains <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> a very interesting ‘historic’ opinion poll<br />

in Slovakia.<br />

There seems to be quite a gap between <strong>the</strong> more nationalist public<br />

expressions <strong>of</strong> politicians <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> moderate approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historians.<br />

Many Hungarian <strong>of</strong>ficials tend to idealize <strong>the</strong> thous<strong>and</strong> years<br />

<strong>of</strong> common Hungarian <strong>and</strong> Slovak <strong>history</strong>, while Slovaks <strong>of</strong>ten describe<br />

this period in terms <strong>of</strong> having been oppressed. Historians<br />

reject <strong>the</strong>se black <strong>and</strong> white interpretations that are <strong>use</strong>d to<br />

underpin <strong>the</strong> separate national identities. These concepts, <strong>the</strong>y say,<br />

were developed only after <strong>the</strong> abolition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feudal structures <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> old Hungary which were replaced by <strong>the</strong> civic concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

nation. To interpret <strong>the</strong> common <strong>history</strong> from before <strong>the</strong> 19 th century<br />

in <strong>the</strong>se terms is unhistorical. Only later statehood became <strong>the</strong><br />

vehicle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nation <strong>and</strong> part <strong>of</strong> political <strong>history</strong>, which had <strong>and</strong> has<br />

a divisive impact. Recent historical studies that concentrate more<br />

on cultural <strong>and</strong> social <strong>history</strong> show that Hungarians <strong>and</strong> Slovaks<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten had a lot in common. The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mixed Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

Historians should certainly be continued beca<strong>use</strong> whatever <strong>the</strong><br />

merits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate, one thing we would like to emphasize is that<br />

indifference towards each o<strong>the</strong>rs histories is an unacceptable form<br />

<strong>of</strong> denial.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!