Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Beyond History <strong>and</strong> <strong>Politics</strong><br />
The Need for Conceptual<br />
<strong>and</strong> Ethical Dialogue<br />
71<br />
Pierre Hassner<br />
Can <strong>history</strong> be objective? Is <strong>the</strong>re such a thing as historical truth?<br />
These questions have fuelled debates in Europe among scholars<br />
but also <strong>the</strong> public at large, particularly during <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> national<br />
<strong>and</strong> ideological revolutions. They concern <strong>the</strong> distinction between<br />
memory <strong>and</strong> <strong>history</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation or separation between <strong>history</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> politics. What <strong>the</strong> contributions to this book confirm is that<br />
<strong>the</strong>se questions are too serious to be left to historians <strong>and</strong> politicians<br />
alone, or ra<strong>the</strong>r that any meaningful answer requires <strong>the</strong><br />
scholar <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> witness, as well as <strong>the</strong> statesman <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> citizen to<br />
recognise a number <strong>of</strong> epistemological <strong>and</strong> ethical criteria which<br />
alone can avoid <strong>the</strong> intellectual danger <strong>of</strong> confusion <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral<br />
danger <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy. Critical self-examination <strong>and</strong> peaceful debate<br />
are equally necessary among historians as well as within <strong>and</strong><br />
between political communities.<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> politics upon historical interpretations <strong>and</strong> viceversa<br />
can be seen at three levels. It is important to distinguish between<br />
<strong>the</strong>se levels even though <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten merge into each o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>and</strong> borderline cases are frequent.<br />
The first is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> founding myth or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrative identity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
people. The second is <strong>the</strong> political exploitation or manipulation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>history</strong> by one political faction against o<strong>the</strong>rs. The third is <strong>the</strong> totalitarian<br />
creation <strong>and</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> an all-encompassing historical<br />
myth which is forced upon <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>of</strong> society <strong>and</strong> upon <strong>the</strong><br />
teaching <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> <strong>history</strong> as an <strong>of</strong>ficial truth, <strong>the</strong> negation<br />
or criticism <strong>of</strong> which is considered treason.<br />
Pierre Hassner is a French specialist <strong>of</strong> international relations. He is<br />
Research Director emeritus at <strong>the</strong> Centre d´Etudes de Recherches<br />
Nationales <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fondation Nationale de Sciences Politiques. He<br />
teaches at <strong>the</strong> Johns-Hopkins University in Bologna. In 2003 Hassner<br />
received <strong>the</strong> prestigious Prix Alexis de Tocqueville which is given to<br />
those who promote humanism <strong>and</strong> civil liberties.