27.07.2013 Views

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Beyond History <strong>and</strong> <strong>Politics</strong><br />

The Need for Conceptual<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ethical Dialogue<br />

71<br />

Pierre Hassner<br />

Can <strong>history</strong> be objective? Is <strong>the</strong>re such a thing as historical truth?<br />

These questions have fuelled debates in Europe among scholars<br />

but also <strong>the</strong> public at large, particularly during <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> national<br />

<strong>and</strong> ideological revolutions. They concern <strong>the</strong> distinction between<br />

memory <strong>and</strong> <strong>history</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation or separation between <strong>history</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> politics. What <strong>the</strong> contributions to this book confirm is that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se questions are too serious to be left to historians <strong>and</strong> politicians<br />

alone, or ra<strong>the</strong>r that any meaningful answer requires <strong>the</strong><br />

scholar <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> witness, as well as <strong>the</strong> statesman <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> citizen to<br />

recognise a number <strong>of</strong> epistemological <strong>and</strong> ethical criteria which<br />

alone can avoid <strong>the</strong> intellectual danger <strong>of</strong> confusion <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral<br />

danger <strong>of</strong> hypocrisy. Critical self-examination <strong>and</strong> peaceful debate<br />

are equally necessary among historians as well as within <strong>and</strong><br />

between political communities.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> politics upon historical interpretations <strong>and</strong> viceversa<br />

can be seen at three levels. It is important to distinguish between<br />

<strong>the</strong>se levels even though <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten merge into each o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>and</strong> borderline cases are frequent.<br />

The first is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> founding myth or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrative identity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

people. The second is <strong>the</strong> political exploitation or manipulation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>history</strong> by one political faction against o<strong>the</strong>rs. The third is <strong>the</strong> totalitarian<br />

creation <strong>and</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> an all-encompassing historical<br />

myth which is forced upon <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>of</strong> society <strong>and</strong> upon <strong>the</strong><br />

teaching <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> <strong>history</strong> as an <strong>of</strong>ficial truth, <strong>the</strong> negation<br />

or criticism <strong>of</strong> which is considered treason.<br />

Pierre Hassner is a French specialist <strong>of</strong> international relations. He is<br />

Research Director emeritus at <strong>the</strong> Centre d´Etudes de Recherches<br />

Nationales <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fondation Nationale de Sciences Politiques. He<br />

teaches at <strong>the</strong> Johns-Hopkins University in Bologna. In 2003 Hassner<br />

received <strong>the</strong> prestigious Prix Alexis de Tocqueville which is given to<br />

those who promote humanism <strong>and</strong> civil liberties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!