Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Real Problem Latvians<br />
Have with History<br />
147<br />
Viktor Makarov<br />
The twentieth century was a century <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>and</strong> hope for Latvia as<br />
an independent nation. It was also a century <strong>of</strong> suffering <strong>and</strong> division.<br />
Hopes were fulfilled as Latvia re-surfaced on <strong>the</strong> world map<br />
two decades ago, but <strong>the</strong>se were decades also marked by a fallout<br />
between <strong>the</strong> two major ethno-linguistic groups <strong>of</strong> Latvians.<br />
Contentious issues between ethnic Latvians <strong>and</strong> Russian-speaking<br />
Latvians are many, but <strong>history</strong> has emerged as <strong>the</strong> most emotional<br />
<strong>and</strong> deeply rooted. When Russian-speaking Latvians, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />
young, ga<strong>the</strong>r in growing numbers in <strong>the</strong> Soviet-era memorial park<br />
near <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> Riga on May 9th each year to celebrate Victory<br />
Day, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> ethnic Latvians feel very differently. The way<br />
<strong>the</strong>y see it, Soviet troops brought not liberation, but renewed<br />
occupation for <strong>the</strong>ir country. Historical passions have hardly calmed<br />
as time goes by, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y shape relations between <strong>the</strong> two major<br />
ethno-linguistic communities. The significance <strong>of</strong> this seems to be<br />
obvious: <strong>the</strong> problem that Latvians have with <strong>history</strong> is that <strong>history</strong><br />
itself is divisive <strong>and</strong> cannot be changed. This is not untrue, but my<br />
argument is different: more than <strong>history</strong> itself, it is <strong>the</strong> divisive political<br />
<strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> ab<strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> it that is <strong>the</strong> real problem. This is something<br />
that can <strong>and</strong> should be changed.<br />
But first, how deeply do Latvians actually disagree over <strong>history</strong>?<br />
There is a mainstream narration <strong>of</strong> twentieth century Latvian <strong>history</strong><br />
that foc<strong>use</strong>s strongly on a number <strong>of</strong> touchstones: <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong><br />
an independent state in 1918 as a culmination <strong>of</strong> centuries <strong>of</strong> historical<br />
national development; <strong>the</strong> involuntary incorporation <strong>of</strong> Latvia<br />
into <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union in 1940 with its tragic effects for <strong>the</strong> country<br />
<strong>and</strong> its people; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> re-establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-Second World<br />
War republic in 1990-1991. These touchstones are hardly contested<br />
today: even <strong>the</strong> most vehement detractors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> re-established<br />
Latvian republic <strong>of</strong> 1990-1991 seem now to have accepted<br />
Viktor Makarov, is Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy centre EuroCivitas in Latvia<br />
<strong>and</strong> Research Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Forum, an internationally oriented<br />
think-tank. He has a degree in political science <strong>and</strong> is doing doctoral<br />
research on national identity <strong>and</strong> democratic citizenship.