Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
Politics of the past: the use and abuse of history - Socialists ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong> world war <strong>and</strong> to exculpate <strong>the</strong> Nazis <strong>of</strong> responsibility for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
atrocities.<br />
Furet acknowledged <strong>the</strong> common intellectual “matrix” <strong>of</strong> communism<br />
<strong>and</strong> fascism <strong>and</strong> argued that “<strong>the</strong> only serious way to approach<br />
<strong>the</strong>se two original ideologies <strong>and</strong> political movements is to<br />
take <strong>the</strong>m toge<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>the</strong> two faces <strong>of</strong> an acute crisis <strong>of</strong> liberal<br />
democracy.” 34 Yet he rejected “simplistic interpretations through<br />
linear causality,” 35 contending instead that fascism <strong>and</strong> communism<br />
were in a dialectical relationship, marked by “mutual endangering<br />
<strong>and</strong> reinforcing.” Furet also objected against <strong>the</strong> relegation <strong>of</strong> fascism<br />
to a secondary role, as a “purely reactive, anti-Bolshevik”<br />
movement. 36 Fascism was not a counterrevolutionary but a genuinely<br />
revolutionary movement which proved potent enough to take<br />
<strong>the</strong> European Right out <strong>of</strong> its political impasse. 37 Both ideologies,<br />
fascist <strong>and</strong> communist, were related yet distinct attempts to solve<br />
“<strong>the</strong> political deficit” <strong>of</strong> modern democracy by integrating <strong>the</strong><br />
masses in novel political regimes.<br />
Beyond Totalitarianism? Critical Perspectives<br />
on <strong>the</strong> Totalitarian Approach<br />
During <strong>the</strong> time, <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> totalitarian model to <strong>the</strong><br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> communist regimes in Eastern Europe came under<br />
concerted attacks in social sciences <strong>and</strong> humanities, being successively<br />
challenged by new social, cultural, <strong>and</strong> anthropological<br />
approaches. The first critical perspectives against <strong>the</strong> totalitarian<br />
approach were put forward after <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Stalin, <strong>the</strong> political<br />
changes set in motion in <strong>the</strong> communist block since 1953 questioning<br />
<strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> totalitarianism as an overarching<br />
label to designate what appeared to be an increasingly diverse<br />
set <strong>of</strong> political regimes. Criticism mounted in <strong>the</strong> 1960s <strong>and</strong> 70s,<br />
when more <strong>and</strong> more North American <strong>and</strong> Western European<br />
scholars undertook research visits to <strong>the</strong> USSR <strong>and</strong> various o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
socialist countries; faced with <strong>the</strong> complexities <strong>of</strong> communist<br />
societies, <strong>the</strong>y began to question cliché views on totalitarian<br />
34 François Furet, The Passing <strong>of</strong> an Illusion: The idea <strong>of</strong> communism in <strong>the</strong><br />
twentieth century (Chicago: University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1999).<br />
35 Furet, Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong> Communism, 2.<br />
36 Furet, Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong> Communism, 35.<br />
37 Furet, Nolte, Fascism <strong>and</strong> Communism, 62<br />
140