13.08.2013 Views

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90<br />

possible. Gen. Epaphras Hoyt, <strong>of</strong> Deerfield, wrote a history <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Indian <strong>war</strong>s more than fifty years ago, which seems to be <strong>the</strong><br />

first effort at analysis. In that work are many important questions<br />

raised and valuable suggestions presented. In regard to this affair<br />

he suggests that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> troops had passed over <strong>the</strong><br />

brook and were wait<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> slow movements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lumber<strong>in</strong>g teams<br />

over <strong>the</strong> rough roads. The Indians crept stealthily about and encompassed<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole company and fell upon <strong>the</strong>m with sudden and<br />

terrible fury, so that many were shot down or disabled at <strong>the</strong> first<br />

volley, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g probably Capt. Lathrop. Doubtless a brave resistance<br />

was made, but with little avail. 96 The com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Capt.<br />

Mosely upon <strong>the</strong> scene after <strong>the</strong> disaster, his subsequent fight and<br />

opportune re<strong>in</strong>forcement by Major Treat, have been previously<br />

related.<br />

As to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> English killed <strong>in</strong> this encounter, early<br />

accounts vary. In <strong>the</strong> postscript to a letter from <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts<br />

Council to Richard Smith, <strong>of</strong> Narraganset, dated Sept. 22, 1675,<br />

and still preserved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Archives, vol. 67, p. 262, <strong>the</strong> statement<br />

is made that " above forty <strong>of</strong> Capt. Lathrop's men with himself<br />

were sla<strong>in</strong> ;" and <strong>the</strong>n it is fur<strong>the</strong>r stated that Capt. Mosely lost<br />

eleven men <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent fight, which toge<strong>the</strong>r with many lost<br />

that were with <strong>the</strong> teams made up sixty-four <strong>in</strong> all, who were<br />

buried <strong>the</strong> next day. Mr. Ma<strong>the</strong>r relates that above three-score<br />

were sla<strong>in</strong>. Mr. Hubbard reckons eighty as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

company <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> English, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g doubtless <strong>the</strong> teamsters, and says<br />

that not above seven or eight escaped. In Rev. Mr. Russell's list,<br />

noticed above, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> sla<strong>in</strong> is put at seventy-one. This last<br />

is probably nearly correct, as Mr. Hull's credits, now for <strong>the</strong> first<br />

time published, after a lapse <strong>of</strong> more than two hundred years, go far<br />

to prove. The list perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to " Bloody Brook " is given below<br />

entire. It has been copied from <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al with <strong>the</strong> utmost<br />

care, and proved and tested letter by letter till I feel sure <strong>of</strong> its<br />

accuracy. This list was first copied by Mr. C<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong> some fifteen<br />

years before he published his "Newbury," and is <strong>the</strong> most nearly<br />

correct <strong>of</strong> any list that has been published hi<strong>the</strong>rto that I know <strong>of</strong>;<br />

but a comparison <strong>of</strong> his text with <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al will show many mis-<br />

takes . The follow<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong> list<br />

:<br />

" At Muddy-Brook bridge y e 18 Sept. 71 men sla<strong>in</strong>e."<br />

Capt. Thomas Laythrop Caleb Kemball George Ropes<br />

Sergt. Thomas Smith Thomas Hobs Joseph Kiuge<br />

Samuel Stevens Robert Homes Thomas Alexander<br />

9G In <strong>the</strong> Harleian Miscellany, vol. 8, p. 72, <strong>in</strong> a letter sent from Boston, Mass., to London,<br />

Dec. 28, 1675, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial manifesto issued by <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts Council,<br />

Dec. 7, 1675, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>war</strong>, is <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g reference to Capt.<br />

Lathrop<br />

:<br />

" Yet let not <strong>the</strong> world censure too much Capt. Lathrop; he, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pequot <strong>war</strong>s, had<br />

done exploits ; nor <strong>in</strong> this would have been beh<strong>in</strong>d-hand if <strong>the</strong> narrow passage or causey,<br />

where his unexpected enemies set on him, would have given him leave to have drawn up<br />

his men."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!