13.08.2013 Views

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NO. XX.<br />

CAPT. JOSEPH SILL AND HIS MEN.<br />

JOSEPH SILL (or as it is variously spelled, Syll, Scill and<br />

Scyll) was <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> John and his wife Joanna, <strong>of</strong> Cambridge,<br />

1637-8, and was born <strong>the</strong>re about 1639. He married, December<br />

5, 1660, Jemima, daughter <strong>of</strong> Andrew and Elizabeth (Danforth)<br />

Belcher, <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, and had children—Andrew, born February<br />

5, 1665-6, died June 12, 1666; Jemima, born September 21,<br />

1667, who married December 21, 1687, John Hall, <strong>of</strong> Medford,<br />

and <strong>in</strong>herited for him her fa<strong>the</strong>r's Narragansett claim ; Elizabeth,<br />

born September 12, married November 12, 1685, Samuel Green,<br />

Jr. ; Andrew and Thomas, <strong>of</strong> whose births no record is found.<br />

Capt. Sill was called <strong>in</strong>to military life early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>war</strong>, and served<br />

almost cont<strong>in</strong>ually, <strong>in</strong> important times and places, till its close.<br />

When Capt. Richard Beers marched with his company up to relieve<br />

<strong>the</strong> garrison at Brookfield, Aug. 5th, 1675, Sill was his lieutenant,<br />

and shared <strong>the</strong> fortunes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company <strong>in</strong> that campaign ; was probably<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fight at " Sugar-Loaf Hill " on August 25th ; but was<br />

probably left at Hadley <strong>in</strong> command <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company<br />

when Capt. Beers, and his twenty-six men, marched to <strong>the</strong> relief<br />

<strong>of</strong> Northfield on September 3d, and were ambushed and nearly all<br />

sla<strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong> 4th, on what is s<strong>in</strong>ce known as " Beers's Pla<strong>in</strong>." After<br />

that disaster he rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> command <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remnant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company<br />

for <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> campaign, and up to October 5th, when he is<br />

mentioned <strong>in</strong> Capt. Mosely's letter as hav<strong>in</strong>g gone with Capta<strong>in</strong><br />

Appleton and a company <strong>of</strong> one hundred and n<strong>in</strong>ety men to protect<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield. On October 4th a letter from <strong>the</strong> Council to Major<br />

Pynchon directs that "Lieut. Scill be dismisse dhome to his fami-<br />

ly," and his <strong>soldiers</strong> to make up some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r companies as <strong>the</strong><br />

Major th<strong>in</strong>ks best.<br />

In a letter from Capt. Appleton at Hadley, October 17th, Capt.<br />

Sill is mentioned as be<strong>in</strong>g still <strong>in</strong> command <strong>of</strong> a company <strong>of</strong> sixty<br />

men ; but he had evidently returned home before November 1st, as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!