13.08.2013 Views

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

Soldiers in King Philip's war. Containing lists of the soldiers of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

267<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g letter was written by his son, who was <strong>the</strong>n at<br />

Portsmouth, as is seen.<br />

Portsm : 28 th : June 1689 ab 4<br />

8 a clock morn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Just now came ashore here From Cocheca Jn° Ham & his wife who<br />

went hence last night homewod (<strong>the</strong>y liv<strong>in</strong>g w th <strong>in</strong> a mile <strong>of</strong> Maj r<br />

"Waldron) & ab' break <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day goe<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> river <strong>in</strong> a cannoo <strong>the</strong>y<br />

heard guns fired but notw th stand<strong>in</strong>g proceeded to Land at Maj r Waldrons<br />

land<strong>in</strong>g place by w ch time it began to be light & <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y Saw ab*<br />

twenty Ind" 9<br />

near Mr. C<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>s Garrison Shoot<strong>in</strong>g & Shout<strong>in</strong>g as many more<br />

about Richard Otis's & Tho: Pa<strong>in</strong>s but Saw <strong>the</strong>ir way clear to Maj r Waldrons<br />

where <strong>the</strong>y Intended Imediately to secure <strong>the</strong>mselves but come<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> gate & call<strong>in</strong>g & knock<strong>in</strong>g could receive noe answer yet saw a light<br />

<strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> y e Chambers & one <strong>of</strong> y m say (look<strong>in</strong>g through a crack <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

gate) that he saw Sundry Ind" 9 w th <strong>in</strong> y e Garrison w ch suppose had mur-<br />

<strong>the</strong>r'd Maj r "Waldron & his Familie & <strong>the</strong>reupon <strong>the</strong>y betook<br />

m<br />

y selves to<br />

make an escape wch <strong>the</strong>y did & mett w th one <strong>of</strong> Otis sons who alsoe escaped<br />

e<br />

from his Fa<strong>the</strong>rs garrison Inform<strong>in</strong>g y' his Fa<strong>the</strong>r and y rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family<br />

were killed. Quickly after [<strong>the</strong>y] set sundry houses afire this is all <strong>the</strong><br />

Accu r<br />

wee have at p sent w ch be<strong>in</strong>g given <strong>in</strong> a Surprize may admitt <strong>of</strong> some<br />

alteration but Doubtlesse <strong>the</strong> most <strong>of</strong> those Families at or ab' Cochecha<br />

are destroyed.<br />

The above Acc lt was related to mee. Richard Waldron jun r .<br />

Mass. Archives, Hutch<strong>in</strong>son Papers, Vol. 3, p. 376.<br />

Tims tragically closed <strong>the</strong> eventful life <strong>of</strong> Major Richard Wal-<br />

derne, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> many <strong>the</strong> most notable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early settlers<br />

<strong>of</strong> New Hampshire.<br />

Wannalanset. On page 254, <strong>the</strong> signature is mispr<strong>in</strong>ted "Wannalancet<br />

by a mistake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ter after <strong>the</strong> last revision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>. In <strong>the</strong><br />

ancient documents and earliest published references <strong>the</strong> name is variously<br />

spelled, like o<strong>the</strong>r Indian names. Indian signatures are nearly always<br />

rude marks, to which some Englishman attached <strong>the</strong> Indian's name, spell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it accord<strong>in</strong>g to his ability to transfer <strong>the</strong> sound as <strong>the</strong> Indian pronounced<br />

it; Sam 11 Numphow apparently signed his own name, he be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Pray<strong>in</strong>g Indians," who had been taught <strong>the</strong> rudiments <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and writ<strong>in</strong>g. The Christian name Samuel, was given <strong>of</strong> course by <strong>the</strong><br />

English, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> custom; so that <strong>the</strong>re is no proper authority for<br />

Indian names except <strong>the</strong> custom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir immediate successors; and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

text I have followed <strong>the</strong> most prevalent form <strong>of</strong> spell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> name (i.e.)<br />

Wannalancet, while <strong>the</strong> signature attached to <strong>the</strong> old chief's mark is spelled<br />

with an s, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> a c. The signature is a copy, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>the</strong> text be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

left to <strong>the</strong> writer's own taste or op<strong>in</strong>ion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!