14.08.2013 Views

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Breeding Bird Survey<br />

8.17 Four breeding bird survey visits were undertaken; a single visit was<br />

undertaken on 17 th June 2007 and three further visits were carried out on<br />

29 th April, 20 th June and 11 th July 2008. The visits undertaken in 2008<br />

involved recording all of the bird species observed, their locations and<br />

activity/behaviour on field maps of the survey area. When the visits were<br />

completed the survey maps were analysed to assess the breeding<br />

populations <strong>for</strong> each species (number of breeding pairs).<br />

Wintering Vantage Point Survey<br />

8.18 Wintering VP watches were carried out at two VPs between 12 October<br />

2007 and 31 March 2008 and amounted to 33.5 hours at VP1 and 35<br />

hours at VP2. The total time spent on VPs there<strong>for</strong>e fell slightly short of the<br />

required survey ef<strong>for</strong>t (36 hours per VP) and could not be recovered in the<br />

time available. This has been accounted <strong>for</strong> in the CRM calculations.<br />

8.19 All VP watches were of three hours duration (except where these were<br />

curtailed due to rapid deterioration in visibility and poor light) and were<br />

carried out at different times of the day between dawn and dusk to account<br />

<strong>for</strong> different levels of bird activity.<br />

8.20 The survey data were inputted into the CRM developed by W. Band and<br />

others (Band et al., in press; SNH, 2000).<br />

Assessment Of Significance<br />

8.21 The method of evaluation and assessment uses a combination of the<br />

following guidance:<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact Assessment (Institute of Ecology and<br />

Environmental Management, 2006);<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Baseline Ecological Assessment (Institute of<br />

Environmental Assessment, 1995); and<br />

Wind Farms and Birds: Calculating a Theoretical Risk Assuming No<br />

Avoiding Action (Scottish Natural Heritage, 2000).<br />

8.22 The assessment of effects is based on determining firstly the value of the<br />

receiving species and secondly the magnitude of the potential impact on<br />

the species, in order to provide an overall impact score and there<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

predicted impact significance. The value of each species of nature<br />

conservation interest is assessed based on the guidance listed above,<br />

incorporating additional advice within the Ratcliffe criteria (1977) and the<br />

IEEM Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact Assessment (2006).<br />

8.23 Firstly, each assessed species is assigned one of the following nature<br />

conservation values:<br />

199<br />

Penny Hill Wind Farm<br />

Environmental Statement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!