14.08.2013 Views

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.28 A significant effect (in terms of the EIA Regulations) is considered to occur<br />

where the combination of sensitivity and magnitude results in a “major” or<br />

“moderate” effect.<br />

10.29 The assessment text (below) considers in detail only those features <strong>for</strong><br />

which a potential effect of “moderate” or higher significance is initially<br />

predicted upon the setting of the feature, based on the distance of the<br />

feature from the site and the feature‟s designatory status (in accordance<br />

with the matrix presented above), and considers the potential effect<br />

against a more defined explanation of the feature‟s setting. Where<br />

considered necessary, setting is defined in terms of the immediate<br />

physical surroundings and associations of the feature, or in wider terms,<br />

such as the presence of key long views to or from that feature which are<br />

important to its understanding.<br />

ZONE OF THEORETICAL VISIBILITY<br />

10.30 The ZTV used in this assessment has been calculated from turbine tip<br />

height to ground contours and does not allow <strong>for</strong> any vegetation (such as<br />

mature blocks of trees) or settlement. The ZTV is calculated to reflect<br />

visibility at approximately 2m above ground level. The ZTV is further<br />

explained in Section 6: Landscape and Visual Assessment of this ES.<br />

10.31 In considering effects using this methodology, the following points need to<br />

be borne in mind. Firstly, the ZTV is a theoretical construct, based upon a<br />

fairly crude base terrain modelling only, with no modelling of settlement<br />

and vegetation cover. Within each “band”, based on numbers of turbines<br />

theoretically visible, no distinction is made in how much of each turbine is<br />

visible. The ZTV there<strong>for</strong>e represents a “worst case scenario” and in reality<br />

visual effects may be substantially less than suggested. Secondly,<br />

mechanical application of the methodology will generate major and<br />

medium effects (simply based on distance and designatory status), <strong>for</strong><br />

which (in case of visual effects upon settings) no mitigation is proposed.<br />

Where this is the case, predicted medium or major effects are discussed in<br />

detail within the assessment text (in Potential Operational Effects) and any<br />

ameliorating conditions highlighted.<br />

BASELINE DESCRIPTION<br />

BASELINE ASSESSMENT<br />

10.32 A desk-based assessment was undertaken by ASWYAS to establish the<br />

baseline condition <strong>for</strong> the proposed development site, based on a study<br />

area (the initial proposed development area) and a 1km buffer around it.<br />

The report is included in Appendix 6. This was supplemented by the<br />

commissioning of a geophysical survey, also carried out by ASWYAS,<br />

over the footprint of the proposed development. The report is also included<br />

in Appendix 6. It is not proposed to repeat that in<strong>for</strong>mation here, but the<br />

following sections have drawn upon that work, supplemented by a<br />

separate consideration of cultural heritage features at a greater distance<br />

229<br />

Penny Hill Wind Farm<br />

Environmental Statement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!