14.08.2013 Views

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.38 Based on the traffic levels in Table 11.2 above, a Transport Statement is<br />

the most suitable assessment <strong>for</strong> the proposed development as the<br />

development trip generation lies well below the indicators <strong>for</strong> a Transport<br />

Assessment. There<strong>for</strong>e this construction traffic assessment fulfils the<br />

requirements of a Transport Statement.<br />

11.39 The total number of vehicle movements generated during the construction<br />

of the proposed development is estimated as 10,768 over a 10-month<br />

period. This takes account of all vehicle movements generated by the<br />

above activities and includes site personnel. This total is broken down in<br />

Table 11.2 above. In summary:<br />

3,508 HGV (including abnormal loads) movements over 10 months;<br />

and<br />

7,260 cars / light vehicles movements over 10 months.<br />

11.40 As noted in Table 11.2, the predicted traffic movements are not uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />

throughout the construction period. The maximum number of vehicle<br />

movements (1,680) is predicted during month 4. The maximum average<br />

vehicle movements per day (assuming 22 working days per month) would<br />

comprise 76 vehicle movements during months 3 and 4 (of which 36 would<br />

be HGV movements).<br />

11.41 During the construction phase there would be on average a maximum of 8<br />

vehicle movements per hour (of which 4 would be HGV movements).<br />

11.42 Occasionally the site may be worked 6-days per week, which would<br />

reduce the average predicted vehicle movements per day. The maximum<br />

ALV movements would occur in months 7 and 8 and would comprise of 68<br />

movements a month or an average of 3 movements per day.<br />

11.43 As previously indicated, it is anticipated that wind turbine components<br />

would approach from the southbound M18 via Junction 1 to the A631, then<br />

B6060, Hawk Hill Lane and Penny Hill Lane. The majority of other vehicle<br />

movements are expected to approach the site from Junction 31 of the M1<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e travelling along the A57, B6463, Common Road and Penny Hill<br />

Lane.<br />

11.44 Tables 11.3 and 11.4 are based on a predicted construction year of 2010<br />

and detail whether the predicted peak traffic increase (76 daily vehicle<br />

movements, 8 hourly vehicle movements) are considered to be significant<br />

or not. The thresholds of significance have been taken from “Guidelines <strong>for</strong><br />

Traffic Impact Assessments” (Institution of Highways and Transportation,<br />

1994). Whilst this assessment of the threshold of significance could be<br />

considered outdated it is a useful tool when acting as a guideline to<br />

identify levels of significance in the assessment.<br />

258<br />

Penny Hill Wind Farm<br />

Environmental Statement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!