14.08.2013 Views

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

environmental statement - Rotherham's Online Application for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

„health effects arising from shadow flicker will not have the potential to<br />

occur Unless the operating frequency of a particular turbine is between 2.5<br />

and 30 hertz and all other pre-conditions <strong>for</strong> shadow flicker effects to occur<br />

exist‟.<br />

15.20 Consequently shadow flicker caused by this development is predicted to<br />

have no adverse health effects.<br />

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS<br />

15.21 The potential <strong>for</strong> cumulative shadow flicker has been investigated. H3<br />

Ulley Beeches is the only receptor which has the potential <strong>for</strong> shadow<br />

flicker to occur from two turbines simultaneously. With the proposed<br />

turbines having a flash rate below 0.7 Hz, a combined flash rate of 1.4Hz<br />

<strong>for</strong> two turbines is well below the threshold of 3 Hz recommended by<br />

Harding et al. (2008) <strong>for</strong> cumulative shadow flicker effects.<br />

MITIGATION<br />

15.22 There are no UK guidelines which quantify what exposure levels of<br />

shadow flicker would be acceptable. Where shadow flicker is found to<br />

cause a nuisance and <strong>for</strong>m an unacceptable impact, mitigation measures<br />

can be implemented in order to reduce the occurrence of shadow flicker.<br />

Such measures include planting tree belts between the affected window<br />

and the turbines; though as previously stated a number of tree lines<br />

surround existing properties which have the potential to dissipate any<br />

occurrence, and shutting down the turbines using turbine control systems<br />

during periods when shadow flicker could theoretically occur. Any turbine<br />

control system would be developed in conjunction with a detailed<br />

monitoring programme and implemented subsequent to the granting of<br />

planning permission.<br />

15.23 No routine mitigation is proposed; this will be kept under review during the<br />

operation of the scheme in case particular combinations of circumstances<br />

arise that increase the potential <strong>for</strong> nuisance (particularly where rooms<br />

affected are in regular occupancy and the effect proves to be a frequent<br />

occurrence in reality). Where nuisance arises, mitigation measures can<br />

be incorporated into the operation of the wind turbines to reduce the<br />

instance of shadow flicker to lower levels.<br />

SUMMARY OF EFFECTS<br />

15.24 A shadow flicker assessment has been undertaken <strong>for</strong> seven buildings<br />

within 1040m of the proposed turbine locations; the theoretical range of<br />

effect. It has been shown that under worst case conditions, the maximum<br />

theoretical occurrence of shadow flicker amounts to 126.9 hours per year,<br />

experienced at Ulley Beeches. The second highest potential occurrence is<br />

104.9 hours per year at Penny Hill Lane, however as previously shown this<br />

has a far lesser potential occurrence when considering other factors such<br />

as actual average hours of sunlight. It is important however to note that<br />

298<br />

Penny Hill Wind Farm<br />

Environmental Statement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!