09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

109<br />

4.2 Ecological Modernization: The Dominant Discursive Framework 1<br />

To the extent that sustainable development has come to have meaning, it has …<br />

primarily served as a vehicle for a form of ‘eco-managerialism’. In its most<br />

sophisticated form it has facilitated elements of what has been called ‘ecological<br />

modernization.’<br />

Frank Fischer and Maarten Hajer (1999:3)<br />

4.2.1 Introducing the Framework<br />

It is to the analysis of the concept of ecological modernization and its relationship<br />

with concept of sustainable development that we now turn. 2<br />

The overarching theme of<br />

the discursive framework of ecological modernization is “sustainable” growth, the key<br />

unit of analysis is the (market) economy and the related policy suggestions are those of<br />

pro-active, competitive action.<br />

Speaking simplistically, the concept of “ecological modernization” is really no<br />

more than an “efficiency-oriented approach to the environment” (Hajer 1995:101). Some<br />

see in it no more than a “neo-liberal environmentalism that is friendly to capitalist<br />

development” (Harper 2001:101). In my view, this is an overly simplistic, and partially<br />

1 In this study, I purposely do not distinguish between a “standard” modernization and an ecological<br />

modernization perspective. No serious scholar today would deny that environmental concerns are relevant<br />

and important for any kind of decision-making. So in my (as well as Hajer’s and other scholars’) view,<br />

ecological modernization rhetoric now is the standard development rhetoric (at least in Europe) to the point<br />

where it only makes sense to identify different levels of environmental commitment within the dominant<br />

perspective of ecological modernization. David Harvey (1996:373-383), by contrast, still (rather<br />

artificially) differentiates between a “standard view of environmental management” and ecological<br />

modernization. Yet even he himself is forced to admit that in this attempt to portray the general<br />

characteristics of ecological modernization, he is “exaggerating both its coherence and its difference from<br />

the standard view” (p.380).<br />

2 Eco-managerialism can be seen as a sub-concept of ecological modernization and it is therefore not<br />

specifically discussed in this study. Broadly defined, it focuses on the management of natural resources,<br />

risks and recreation (also see Luke 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!