09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334<br />

chiefly guided by political and/or Keynesian pro-investment rationales (exemplified by<br />

the Polish as well as some EU governments). Assuming larger “structural” benefits, the<br />

latter are always less concerned about the particular financial costs and benefits of<br />

individual infrastructure projects. 20<br />

However, as Judge (2000:488) concluded in a recent<br />

review of the regional and environmental dimensions of Polish motorway policy,<br />

despite government rhetoric about the regional benefits of the motorway system, there<br />

is no published research on where these benefits might arise. … Instead, the strategic<br />

development aspects have de facto been submerged by financing issues, the drive to<br />

enter the European Union and controversy over the environmental impact.<br />

Lastly, it should be obvious that the World Bank’s suggestion to privilege<br />

highway investments in the Pan-European corridors around Warsaw was of course well<br />

suited to the EU’s strategic interests.<br />

The Polish government remained reluctant to give up its vast motorway<br />

ambitions, however. It is highly revealing that in this context, TINA was portrayed by<br />

the Polish government as an “EU initiative” that is “encouraging” a particular set of<br />

infrastructures, and not as the Pan-European effort to deliver an objective CEE needs<br />

assessment that it purported to be. Otherwise, the government showed itself amenable to<br />

various reform ideas in the rail and public transport sectors, but firm in its commitment<br />

towards motorway construction. Finally, the government also made it very clear that the<br />

NGOs’ renunciation-type demands of advocating lower levels of traffic stood no chance<br />

under the current political regime. 21<br />

20 Remember that there are increasing empirical challenges to this Keynesian governmental pro-growth<br />

infrastructure-building argument (also see the relevant sections of chapters 2 and 6).<br />

21 The actual summary points presented by the Polish government during the debate over the Alternative<br />

Transport Policy were as follows (Attachment 2, World Bank 1999:34):<br />

Yes, the Ministry will take environmental concerns into account.<br />

It will be hard to stop the motorway program.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!