09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

135<br />

In related studies, car accidents appear as an individualized risk which directly<br />

translates into a major social cost associated with this mode. The TERM reports<br />

published by the European Environmental Agency are a perfect example of such<br />

awareness-raising scientific “objective” reporting. Figure 4.1 shows a graph taken from<br />

the 2001 TERM report (European Environment Agency (EEA) 2001) that is clearly<br />

making the point that the risk of car accidents imposes exorbitant external costs on<br />

society. The credited sources are INFRAS and IWW, two major European research<br />

institutions which conducted an external cost study on behalf of the International Union<br />

of Railways. The resulting policy recommendation is without doubt a decreased<br />

dependence on individual car transport. This example illustrates how complex arguments<br />

related to the environmental impacts of transport are effectively short-circuited through<br />

the implicit assumption that standard cost benefit methodologies developed by major<br />

research institutions correctly and objectively capture environmental risks and costs<br />

associated with the different modes, even if the relevant research is clearly initiated and<br />

paid for by a stakeholder with a vested interest in demonstrating problems associated<br />

with car transport. 30<br />

In sum, society has become dependent on experts to quantify, assess<br />

and ultimately remedy the environmental and social risks associated with modern<br />

transport systems. This prospect is disempowering to laypersons who are often<br />

confronted with contrasting “scientific” assessments.<br />

30 Note that I personally do not think that the INFRAS/IWW assessments are politically biased. I<br />

nevertheless agree that it is important to point out that, in the end, all environmental cost calculations are of<br />

course socially constructed. What exact value we attach to qualities such as equal mobility rights, clean air,<br />

unservered landscapes and good public health is ultimately a matter of societal consensus-building and<br />

political argumentation. Economics remains a social science.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!