09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

353<br />

There are thirteen [road sector] projects proposed to receive ISPA support within the<br />

coming medium term period. These projects from [sic] the 'long' list in the first etap<br />

[phase]. Most of these projects are situated in the Helsinki Corridor and belong to the<br />

TINA network. 4 projects from the 'long' list being able to start in 2000 have been put<br />

to the so-called 'short' list (4.1-4.4). After a site visit experts delegated by European<br />

Committee DG XVI [sic] suggested 2 of these 4 projects to form part of ISPA 2000.<br />

[These are:]<br />

1. Construction of Motorway M7 between Budapest and Zamárdi […]<br />

2. Construction of Motorway M3 between Füzesabony and Polgár<br />

So at least at this point, the top two ISPA road priorities were still fully congruent<br />

with the national development objectives in the Széchenyi Plan. EU delegates had also<br />

clearly identified these particular projects as top ISPA priorities. Of the additional eleven<br />

projects listed in the document, most of them were also congruent with the Széchenyi<br />

Plan priorities. In particular, of the listed ISPA priorities 3 through 7, only one project,<br />

the expressway M43, differed from the Széchenyi Plan priorities. All other projects<br />

listed, i.e. the Eastern section of the M0 ring road, the M30 between Emöd and Miskolc,<br />

the M7 between Zamárdi and Letenye and the M9 expressway bridge across the Danube<br />

at Szekszárd come straight from the Széchenyi Plan priority list.<br />

For reasons explained above, the final ISPA strategy document from June 2000<br />

then presents a very different picture. Challenged to explain the sudden withdrawl of<br />

almost all previous top road priorities from the final ISPA document, the Hungarian<br />

government chose to downplay this radical departure by pretending that only two projects<br />

were withdrawn. As the final ISPA Strategy has it:<br />

At the beginning of 2000 a new Government Decision was made (2037/2000) to<br />

speed-up the construction of new motorways. The Hungarian Development Bank Ltd.<br />

was entrusted with full responsibility for the financing of motorway and expressway<br />

development, and NA Rt. was requested to contract directly with Hungarian firms for<br />

the construction of priority motorway sections. As a result of this decision, two<br />

motorway projects which were previously considered for ISPA Funding, M7 and M3,<br />

were withdrawn from the list of potential ISPA projects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!