09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

383<br />

9.5.5 Reexamining the impact of ring roads on travel & land use<br />

In order to be able to better evaluate the important objections to the M0 regarding<br />

its future environmental risks of sprawl and increased car use, I will now take a brief look<br />

at the state-of-the-art knowledge on the impact of ring roads on travel and land use<br />

patterns. As already noted above, in theory, ring roads are designed to divert traffic away<br />

from city centers in order to avoid congestion in the core. They are seen as being<br />

beneficial both to the inner city populations who will no longer be affected by the<br />

negative impacts of transit traffic passing through their neighborhoods, and to the road<br />

users for whom the by-pass affords substantial time savings. Unfortunately, this<br />

otherwise impeccable logic has two central flaws: first, it ignores the medium to longterm<br />

effects that high-speed, limited-access ring roads have on overall land-use and travel<br />

patterns in the region, and second, it intentionally re-locates local environmental impacts,<br />

namely noise, air pollution and severance effects, from one location to another, thereby<br />

pre-programming LULU 13<br />

/ NIMBY reactions. It is the first, much more complex<br />

problem which concerns us in this section.<br />

The strongest general counter-argument against expanding high-speed road<br />

capacities whenever congestion occurs is that a temporary easing of traffic conditions<br />

will in fact induce additional travel, thus causing additional congestion in the medium to<br />

long term. The issue remains a matter of academic dispute, although evidence in support<br />

of this interpretation has been mounting in recent decades. At least for the case of peakhour<br />

travel on limited access roads, Anthony Downs (1962; 1992) has by now rather<br />

thoroughly debunked the myth that it is possible to build one’s way out of congestion.<br />

13 Land uses perceived as detrimental to a particular area by nearby residents are often called LULUs (=<br />

locally unwanted land uses) . What is considered a LULU varies throughout a city and also depends upon<br />

the affluence and history of the neighborhood.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!