09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

299<br />

The question of priorities is still open. The maturity of a project is an essential factor<br />

for its selection for European funding. Other main parameters that can influence the<br />

priority of a project are whether the projects contributes towards<br />

?? increase of capacity – elimination of bottlenecks;<br />

?? development of links toward not well-developed areas;<br />

?? development of links to the TENs;<br />

?? better functioning of the network – increase of its attractiveness;<br />

?? completion of an already started programme;<br />

?? lower operating costs;<br />

?? etc.<br />

This list is particularly interesting in light of future emerging justifications for<br />

individual projects under ISPA. The argument that projects should receive funding<br />

simply because they have already been started is certainly curious. Moreover, embedded<br />

in an overall modernization discourse emphasizing “missing links” and “bottlenecks” we<br />

suddenly also find elements of a “infrastructure-for-cohesion” discourse, namely via the<br />

reference of “links towards not well-developed areas.” In essence, this formulation<br />

leaves the door open for cohesion-type rural infrastructure projects that could not<br />

otherwise be justified via economic or financial assessment criteria. This is a particularly<br />

sensitive issue in the case of Hungary’s disputed M3 highway crosses rural territory in<br />

Eastern Hungary and ends at the Ukrainian border (also see Hook 1998a).<br />

A further remark about “bottlenecks” is in order as well. Although discourses<br />

related to “bottlenecks” were clearly the types of rhetorical tropes which the authors of<br />

the report welcomed to further highlight the urgency of their cause, it seems that it was<br />

very clear to everyone involved that the related maps in Annex IX of the report indicating<br />

“TINA Road and Rail Bottlenecks” for the year 2005, 2010 and 2015 would never hold<br />

up as accurate predictions of future CEE infrastructure capacity deficiencies. In any case,<br />

the TINA report itself makes little to no reference to these maps, thus already implicitly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!