09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

increasing congestion, air pollution, natural resource depletion, accidents and dominance<br />

of a road lobby, he concludes that critics distort the situation and that all these problem<br />

are solvable, preferably by building new, state-of-the art infrastructures. To him,<br />

modernization certainly means increasing automobilization, since “the car is an<br />

extraordinary key to freedom and quality of life.” His positivist belief in technical<br />

progress is unfailing:<br />

Of course, it would be absurd to deny the existence of harmful effects linked to the use<br />

of road vehicles. But in areas such as air pollution, they are now often grossly<br />

exaggerated. In fact, the problem is now being solved, as remarkable progress has<br />

been made by vehicle manufacturers.... Why should air quality be the only area where<br />

technological progress does not yield results?<br />

A similar attitude is apparent in the publication “Towards More Rational<br />

Transport Policies in Europe” by Achim Diekmann (1995:11):<br />

In a few years time, pollution by motor vehicles will have ceased to be a major<br />

problem and there will be sizeable cuts in fuel consumption as well. … Mobility must<br />

no longer be discriminated against. On the contrary, it has again to be seen as a<br />

positive, dynamic element in our society, as a provider of growth and welfare.<br />

It is typical for such positivist believers in technological progress to claim that<br />

their own views are non-ideological, and strictly based on “objective” evaluation of the<br />

facts. Excerpts from Gerondeau’s concluding paragraph reveal an interesting,<br />

“objectivizing” opinionatedness:<br />

There is then the risk that decisions are made based on ideological aphorisms. But<br />

ideology should have no place in transport policy. ... Means of transport are only tools.<br />

... The things that count are services rendered ... and the financial side of the issue, as<br />

one of the first duties of any public or private service is to not squander resources. ...<br />

It is a question of making the best possible decisions objectively and on the basis on<br />

facts and not opinions. ... All that really counts is the happiness of the people and the<br />

proper functioning of the economy, which is one of its conditions.<br />

(Gerondeau 1997 pp. 299-300, emphasis added)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!