09.11.2013 Views

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

PLANNING FOR A SUSTAINABLE EUROPE? - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

185<br />

The 1998 Decision is particularly relevant in that transport, together with<br />

agriculture, energy, industry, and tourism, was one of five chosen “target sectors” whose<br />

selection was to give “additional impetus” to the implementation in the two remaining<br />

years of the program. While this is certainly commendable, actual listed priority<br />

objectives within the transport sector were rather pedestrian and largely repeated previous<br />

eco-modernist commitments and sound bites, e.g. “tighten provisions on emissions and<br />

noise,” “achieve better internalisation of external costs in transport prices,” “promoting a<br />

more integrated transport policy,” “better integration of land-use and transportation,”<br />

“promoting demand-management measures,” “facilitating intermodality,” or<br />

“encouraging public and/or collective transport and low-emission vehicles.” However,<br />

the decision also mentioned the concrete aim to reduce the imbalances between different<br />

transport modes by developing methodologies for Strategic Environmental Assessment<br />

(SEA) 6 for the TENs and for corridor analysis. This concrete aim eventually translated<br />

into several pilot studies in that area, as well as an entire handbook on SEA. However, to<br />

date, there has been no SEA performed on either the TENs or TINA (also see Chapter 7).<br />

Remarkably, the Decision does not contain a single mention of (the need to<br />

promote) non-motorized transport, and apart from cursory mentions of the need to favor<br />

public transport, the transport priority section is entirely silent on the topic of urban<br />

transport. This is especially surprising given the fact that in a later section on priority<br />

issue areas, Article 10 on the “promotion of local and regional initiatives” specifically<br />

mentions that “particular attention will be given to [...] (b) developing a comprehensive<br />

6 SEAs are sometimes also called Strategic Environmental Impact Assessments (SEIAs). SEA is the more<br />

commonly used acronym that is used throughout this study. The actual phrase used in the decision is more<br />

already cautious not to demand outright that an SEA on the TENs be performed - a long-term demand of<br />

environmental NGOs - but rather aims at “developing potential methods of analysis with a view to strategic<br />

evaluation of the environmental impact of the trans-European transport network.” Also see Chapter 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!