Tweaking Optimizing Windows.pdf - GEGeek
Tweaking Optimizing Windows.pdf - GEGeek
Tweaking Optimizing Windows.pdf - GEGeek
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Examples of terminology used<br />
You will encounter terms like "multiplier" and "bus-speed". If you have an Intel CPU, you do not need to worry too much about<br />
"multiplier" as you cannot alter this on any CPU manufactured after August 1998. Chances are your Intel CPU was made after that<br />
date. You are more interested in "bus-speed". A Celeron 400 runs at a multiplier of 6x, and a bus speed of 66Mhz. So multiply 6 by<br />
66 and you have 400Mhz. The "multiplier" in this case is 6x and the "bus speed" in this case is 66Mhz. Easy!<br />
Ok, lets try another - a Pentium III 700e runs at 7x multiplier and 100Mhz bus speed. Yep - that rights - times 7 x 100 = 700Mhz.<br />
In this case you have a "multiplier" of 7 and a "bus speed" of 100Mhz. OK try one yourself - a Celeron 300 runs with a multiplier of<br />
4.5. What is the "bus speed" of that CPU?. If you did the math and divided 300 by 4.5 (300 / 4.5) and got 66Mhz then award<br />
yourself a gold star!<br />
Here's one for you AMD fanatics - the water is slightly muddied here as internally AMD chipsets run at 200Mhz. However you don't<br />
really need to worry about that since the clock itself is running at 100MHz. What you see as the end user is the 100Mhz. So a Duron<br />
650 runs at 6.5 x 100 as far as you - the overclocker - is concerned. So to get 715Mhz out of a Duron 650, you'd set the bus speed<br />
to 110Mhz and Presto! Your Duron 650 is now running at 715Mhz or 6.5 x 110.<br />
From initial reports, it appears that the Pentium 4 uses a similar method to the Athlon, running its Front Side Bus clock at 100MHz<br />
while actually transferring data at 400MHz. For our purposes, you can assume that the clock is actually 100MHz. So the 1.5Ghz unit<br />
will be running 15x100=1500MHz. Initial reports indicate that the FSB can be pushed to about 125MHz without too much difficulty,<br />
yeilding a 500MHz effective FSB speed and reasonable overclocking potential. Note that the DRDRAM speed is derived from the FSB<br />
speed using a 4x Multipler. PC800 DRDRAM runs at 400MHz so this is perfect for it. 500MHz may be beyond the capabilities of some<br />
DRDRAM so we might begin to see motherboards that allow adjustment of this DRDRAM multiplier. Armed with this knowledge you<br />
will attempt to increase the bus speed on your motherboard to increase the speed of your CPU! For instance, if you can increase the<br />
bus speed of your Celeron 566 up to 75 Mhz, your new speed will be 8.5 x 75 = 638MHz!<br />
Is overclocking dangerous?<br />
Several times you've probably heard people say that CPU overclocking is dangerous. Usually it seems like newbies, PC retailers, and<br />
CPU manufacturers say these things. Is overclocking really dangerous? Well, yes and no. And keep in mind, it's "dangerous" for<br />
your CPU; not for you, personally. If you truly know what you're doing, it really isn't that dangerous. But even an experienced<br />
overclocker can kill a CPU if they aren't careful or overlook certain things like voltage. For the average PC user, overclocking is more<br />
dangerous. The safety precautions that an overclocking veteran would take may be overlooked by a newbie. So, when Intel (for<br />
example) declares that overclocking is risky and can be dangerous, they are usually saying so for all the newbies out there that are<br />
new or unfamiliar to overclocking. It's simply for liability.<br />
Overclocked processor lifetime<br />
Worst case scenario for the lifetime of a non-burned out overclocked processor is over two years, while most processors will<br />
continue to function after five or six years. Unless you don't upgrade your system except when it breaks (this is very uncommon<br />
among overclockers and tweakers alike), you should never run into a problem with your processor's lifetime.<br />
Electromigration<br />
If you strip everything down to its most basic function, a processor conducts electricity through a series of transistors to perform its<br />
various functions. Electrical currents generate heat. Heat assists in the breakdown of metal. Since transistors are made of<br />
conductive metals, heat is a danger to them. When you force them to work faster, they consume more power per unit time, and<br />
generate even more heat. Each transistor within the chip's core develops an electrostatic charge over time, much like the way iron<br />
can develop a magnetic charge that will linger after any electric current has subsided.<br />
CPUs and other processors are subject to electromigration, which is the gradual breakdown of the very components that carry the<br />
circuit's electricity. The actual circuit paths may form shorts or create open circuits through electromigration. Due mainly to this<br />
phenomenon, every component in a PC has a one hundred percent failure rate--provided it's operated long enough, any computer<br />
processor will eventually fail. Heat accelerates electromigration. Keeping a processor in an overclocked state for a long time will<br />
hasten its demise. Overclocking has the equivalent effect on a component as running a car engine over the redline for extended<br />
periods: it shortens their life expectancy. Considering that modern processors are designed to have a life of at least 10 years, even<br />
if you shorten your CPU's life by half, it would still be obsolete much faster than it will fail.<br />
Even if a system keeps its processor at a relatively cool temperature, pushing it beyond its limits can still result in unpredictable--<br />
and risky--behavior. Simply cooling at the surface of the chip doesn't necessarily dissipate all the heat generated inside the CPU<br />
itself. Overclocked systems can exhibit symptoms ranging from graphical glitches to data loss. Electrostatic migration shouldn't be a<br />
problem for most overclocked processors unless you exceed the company's maximum core frequency for that particular model of<br />
core.<br />
If you are exceeding the maximum frequency for a particular model of core, you need to be careful as to how long you have your<br />
computer running and how many consecutive hours a day you have it turned off. The longer you have your computer turned off at<br />
one time, the longer it will take for electrostatic migration to affect your system. You can't stop electrostatic migration from<br />
occurring, but depending on how you use your computer will determine how fast it will begin to take hold. Don't worry about it too<br />
much though, because even in the worst cases, it still takes a few years before it starts causing problems.<br />
Safety precautions<br />
There are a couple of very important things to keep in mind when you are attempting to overclock a computer, so that you don't<br />
damage your equipment. The first of these things is to make sure you have adequate cooling to take on the project you are<br />
planning. As will be discussed later, cooling can make or break an overclock - but that isn't its only benefit. It also helps prevent<br />
damage being done to the chips due to excessive heat.<br />
Ok, now that I have taken care of explaining the importance of cooling to you, on to the (second) most important safety precaution<br />
- which has to do with progressive overclocking. I know, I know, that isn't a term most people have ever heard of - and that's<br />
because I just coined the term. Progressive overclocking has to do with the process of slowly clocking your system faster and faster<br />
until it reaches its peak stable speed. The process with a CPU is more difficult - mainly because it is hastlesome to go back into the<br />
BIOS for every clock change. With bus clocks, bus multipliers, and chip voltages to contend with, things aren't always hunky-dory.