P. Derek Overfield PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

118 Th " h "" f t "
~s p rase ~s ~n ac present ~n
it is omitted by p46 B DC K et ale
~ A C D* P et a1 ~
119 e.g. 3:7, 5:6, 10:16.
120See below PP.200-03.
l2lCf B.S. Childs "Psalm 8 in the Context of the
Christian Canon" Int 23 (1969), pp. 20-31.
122This futuristic eschatological emphasis is clearer
in 1 Cor 15 than in Heb 2. In the former text the
subjection of all creation to Christ is an event which
is not yet, but which must happen in an assured future.
Cf J .K. Freeborn "Eschatology in 1 Cor 15" TU 87 (1964)"
pp. 556-568; C.K. Barrett A Commentary on the First
Epistle to the Corinthians London: 1968~ pp. 358f;
F. Hahn Ope cit. p.132. In Heb 2 the initial
emphasis is on the fact that universal dominion is the
future destiny of man, but although Christ is exalted
the future salvation which he will accomplish is not
yet fully ~ealieed. Cf H.W. Montefiore A Commentary
on the Epi3tle to the Hebrews, Londc~: 1964; pp. 58-61;
w'.B. Wallid "T(-:e Use of Psalms 8 and 110 in 1 Corinthians
15:25-27" J.Ev. Th. Soc. 15 (1972) pp. 25-29;
S. Kistemaker OPe cit., pp. 102-108.
123For a mcre detailed survey, see A. Vis The Messianic
Psalm Citations, Amsterdam: 1939; pp. 24-28.
124Citations from Soncino Edition'unless otherwise
stated.
125significantly the citation does not go on to
include v.6 although this verse would have strengthened
the argument being advanced by the Rabbi at this point.
126C;tat;on f V" "t 26f
..L ..L rom ~s OPe c~ ., pp. •
127E• KClnig Die lressianischen Weissagungen des Altes
Testament as cited by Vis, ibid.
128 cY?tox6:tw in Mk 12:36 is not well supported textually,
only being found in B n gr W among the major witnesses;
the alternative u7I:oit60toy is much better attested:
N A K L X et ale But because ~1tox6:tw is not
d~sputed in Mt 22:44 it presumably must be also read
in Mk 12:36
xvi