P. Derek Overfield PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

xat x~puxa~~~ !~t ~~ '~y6~u~~ a~~oU ~e~&yo~ay xal
~e:01.\I ~p~'t'i5v et, m\l~a ~a. ~e~ (Luke 24:47).
The argument above has shown that it is impossible
to say wi,th any degree of certainty that Ps 67:19
occurs either in Acts 2:33 or 5:31.
This is
important because, as we shall see later, one possible
interpretation of Ps 67:19 in Eph 4:8, although not
depending on a possible occurrenceof the psalm in
Acts, would be very much strengthened if it could be
shown that Ps 67: 19 in a.' diff.erent, form from t:lat
of Eph 4:8 did occur in either or both Acts 2:33, 5:31.
2.2.2 Eohesians: Lock's Theory
W. Lock 26 could write of Ephesians "it
has been called the Christian 68th Psalm and recclls
in many ways that great Jewish Psalm of victory •.•
He [the author] quotes it and applies it to Christ
(iv:8) but besides this quotation'there are many
points of similarity wi thi t in thought and language II'.
If this view is correct we should have yet another
point of departure for the interpretation of Eph 4:8. 27
We shall then examine this view in some detail, paying
attention to the individual texts cited by Lock
as being based on, or related to, phrases in the
psalm.
-99-