27.12.2013 Views

P. Derek Overfield PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

P. Derek Overfield PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

P. Derek Overfield PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. - THE NATURE OF CHRIST'S HEADSHIP<br />

It is agreed by all exegetes that X€~~~<br />

takes on a decisive theological significance when<br />

referred to Christ and the Church in both Ephesians<br />

and Colossians , although there is little agreement a s<br />

to what this significance may be.<br />

The question resolves<br />

itself into two parts:<br />

'over what precisely is Christ<br />

head? ' or, put more simply, ' is there one headship<br />

(over all things ) or two (head of the church;<br />

head of<br />

the cosmos ) ? '<br />

Secondly, ' how does this headship<br />

affect either (or both) Church and/or cosmos?'<br />

The answer to the first question has<br />

already in part been given by our argument that c ,~,<br />

(l : 22 ) is determinative and as such implie's that there<br />

are two headships involved;<br />

one in relation to the<br />

cGsmos and the other to the Church.<br />

This statement<br />

raises two separate questions:<br />

' is the nature of both<br />

headships the same? ' and, ' what is the significance<br />

of ~1t!p mv't'" in 1: 22?' It is these questions that<br />

we now seek to answer.<br />

4.1 1:22 Head of the World<br />

The first thing that concerns us here is<br />

the significance of the accusative construction<br />

mv'tQ.<br />

•<br />

1<br />

C ..<br />

l)1t~ p<br />

22 ,<br />

According to C.F.D. Moule \)1ttp + accusative<br />

h as , generally speaking , a more literal significance<br />

-274-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!