12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 INTRODUCTION [SEC.14<br />

step in output power was due to an improvement in the magnetron itself.<br />

The increase at 10-cm wavelength in the early part of 1941 was brought<br />

about by the development of modulators of higher power.<br />

It is important to realize that the curves of Fig. 1.5 lie above one<br />

another in the order of increasing wavelength not because development<br />

was begun earlier at 10 cm than at 3 cm, and earlier at 3 cm than at 1 cm,<br />

but because magnetrons of the type used in radar are subject to inherent<br />

limitations on maximum power which are more severe the shorter the<br />

wavelength. The same is true of the r-f transmission lines used at<br />

microwave frequencies. The horizontal dashed lines shown in Fig. 15a<br />

show the maximum power that can be handled in the standard sizes of<br />

‘‘ waveguide” used for r-f transmission at the three bands.<br />

A similarly spectacular decrease in the minimum detectable signal,<br />

due to the improvement of microwave radar receivers, has marked the<br />

war years. In the wavelength bands above about 10 m, natural “static”<br />

and man-made interference set a rather high noise level above which<br />

signals must be detected, so that there is little necessity for pursuing the<br />

best possible receiver performance. This is not true at microwave frequencies.<br />

Natural and man-made interference can be neglected at these<br />

frequeficies in comparison with the unavoidable inherent noise of the<br />

receiver. This has put a premium on the development of the most<br />

sensitive receivers possible; at the end of 1945 microwave receivers were<br />

within a factor of 10 of theoretically perfect performance. Improvement<br />

by this factor of 10 would increase the range of a radar set only by the<br />

factor 1.8; and further receiver improvement can today be won only by<br />

the most painstaking and difficult attention to details of design.<br />

Why Microwave s?-The reader will have observed that when radar is<br />

discussed in what has gone before, microwave radar is assumed. This is<br />

true of the balance of this book as well. So far as the authors of this<br />

book are concerned, the word m.dar implies not only pulse radar, as has<br />

already been remarked, but microwave pulse radar. Though it is true<br />

that the efforts of the Radiation Laboratory were devoted exclusively to<br />

microwave pulse radar, this attitude is not entirely parochialism. The<br />

fact is that for nearly every purpose served by radar, microwave radar<br />

is preferable. There are a few applications in which longer-wave radar<br />

is equally good, and a very few where long waves are definitely preferable,<br />

but for the overwhelming majority of radar applications microwave radar<br />

is demonstrably far more desirable than radar operating at longer<br />

wavelengths.<br />

The superiority of microwave radar arises largely because of the<br />

desirability of focusing radar energy into sharp beams, so that the direction<br />

as well as the range of targets can be determined. In conformity<br />

with the well-known laws of physical optics, by which the sharpness of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!