12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 THE RADAR EQUATION [SEC.28<br />

first amplifier stage-are taken into account, together with the fact that<br />

the input impedance of microwave receivers is not unlimited, the optimum<br />

value of R turns out to be finite. The condition R = Z is, in fact, not<br />

unusual. This condition, in our ideal system of Fig. 2.3, leads to<br />

(21)<br />

A question of fundamental interest, though not as yet of much<br />

practical moment, is the one raised eaiiier about the temperature to be<br />

assigned to the antenna radiation resistance. This is certainly not in<br />

general the temperature of the metal parts of the, antenna. The reader<br />

may correctly surmise, from what has been said, that the effective temperature<br />

of this element of the circuit is that of any surroundings of the<br />

antenna with which the antenna can exchange energy by radiation—that<br />

is to say, it is the temperature (or a suitable average of the temperatures)<br />

of whatever would absorb energy radiated by the antenna as a transmitter.<br />

This has indeed been demonstrated experimentally. It has been<br />

shown 1that a microwave antenna pointed at the sky receives only a very<br />

small amount of radiation, corresponding to an absolute temperature of<br />

at most a few degrees. If our receivers were very nearly ideal this would<br />

have the practical result of making it much easier to detect aircraft<br />

appearing at high angles of elevation. In the best existing receivers the<br />

reduction in noise output which could be obtained by pointing the antenna<br />

upward would amount to some 10 per cent.<br />

The foregoing somewhat academic discussion of thermal noise would<br />

be inappropriate in this place were it not for two facts. First, microwave<br />

receivers, even as this is written, have been brought so close to the<br />

pinnacle of ideal performance that it is well for the radar engineer to<br />

appreciate the nearness, and the finality, of the goal. Second, thermal<br />

noise, although it is not wholly to blame for the noise background in<br />

microwave receivers, provides a very convenient standard in terms of<br />

which the performance of an actual receiver can be specified.<br />

We shall define, as the over-all noise jigure N of a receiver, the ratio of<br />

signal power available from the antenna to kZ’@, 2 when the mean noise<br />

power and the signal power are equal as observed at some stage in the<br />

receiver where both have been amplified so highly as to override completely<br />

any noise introduced by succeeding stages. In framing the definition<br />

so broadly we have in effect included, under “receiver,” not only the<br />

rnixer but all associated r-f circuits. It is well to do so at this stage, for the<br />

analysis of the contribution of each part of the input system to the over-<br />

I R. H. Dicke, ‘(The Measurementof Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies,”<br />

RL Report No. 787. See also Dicke etal., Phys. Rsu., 70, 340 (1946).<br />

2In thisdefinitionT is customarily,and arbitrarily,takento be 291“K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!