12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 PROPERTIES OF RADAR TARGETS [SEC. 38<br />

‘—-m—–-——” “ Because of interference, the received power varies<br />

,-:<br />

LA ~<br />

I between O and 4 times the po~ver received from<br />

one of the targets.<br />

A beautiful example of the change of signal<br />

power with 1, as predicted by this formula, is<br />

given in Fig. 3,6, which sho~vs sucmssive frames<br />

...<br />

?’LJ_<br />

0<br />

,g<br />

0<br />

a-—l<br />

IO ...<br />

1-<br />

1.4 .:<br />

,*<br />

“k,<br />

o’ . .<br />

.- —.. .-J<br />

FIG. 3.6.—Successive<br />

frames of a photographic<br />

recording of an A-scope<br />

trace at +sec intervals.<br />

of a photographic recording of an A-scope trace<br />

at +T-sec intervals. These recordings \rere obtained<br />

on Deer Island in Boston Harbor, The<br />

signal on the right-hand side is received from<br />

the antenna towers of Radio Station WBZ. The<br />

.,<br />

c+)~ ? signals received from these two towers overlap<br />

~L_.JL in the center and there show the effects of destructive<br />

and constructive interference. In the<br />

fd<br />

last frame (No. 0311 ) and in the enlarged frame<br />

(No. 0479, Fig. 37) the parts of the signal \vhere<br />

there is no overlapping are separated by a gap of<br />

zero power due to destructive interference in the<br />

overlapping region. In Frame h-o. 0303 and in<br />

Frame No. 0538, Fig. 37, we have full constructive<br />

interference. The deflection of the A-scoue .<br />

used w-as not linear in the power, so that the<br />

highest deflection with constructive interference<br />

is only 3 times that of the individual signals,<br />

whereas the power itself is 4 times the power<br />

received from the towers individually. The<br />

change in power is due to changes in the distance<br />

1 arising from a swaying motion of the towers.<br />

The other possible cause, change of wavelength<br />

due to change in frequency or refractive index,<br />

has been ruled out.’ Correlation was actually<br />

observed between the wind velocity and the rate<br />

of fluct uat ion. The towers would have to move<br />

only one inch relative to each other to change<br />

from constructive to destructive interference.<br />

In Eq. (23) we note further that the return<br />

power from a complex target consisting of two<br />

equal isotropic scatterers a fixed distance apart<br />

depends upon k, and that the change in signal<br />

for a given wavelength change increases with the<br />

value of 1. This fact has been applied in a<br />

18ee Propagation of Short Radio ~~aves, Vol. 13, Sec.<br />

6.17, Radiation Laboratory Series.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!