12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

256 RADAR BEACONS [SEC.85<br />

In the case of beacons interrogated and received bya radar set, ~,is<br />

nearly equal to X,; (Gd ~.. usually equals (GE,)~.. since the same antenna<br />

is likely to be involved; and (GR,)~~.usually equals (G~,)~,. since beacon<br />

antennas for receiving and transmitting need to have the same radiation<br />

pattern and are therefore alike. The condition for balance of the two<br />

links, namely that R: equal R:, then becomes<br />

The receiver of the beacon is almost always less sensitive than that of the<br />

radar, either by necessity (because of the greater bandwidth), or by<br />

choice to avoid undesired triggering (see below); hence P:, < P~i. In<br />

the balanced system, then, the transmitter of the beacon may as well be<br />

less powerful than that of the radar in the same proportion.<br />

In actual cases, Eq. (1) and a corresponding equation for the received<br />

power in the reply link involve two additional factors. One of these is a<br />

geometrical factor that expresses the effects of interference and diffraction.<br />

The other takes account of the attenuation of the radiation in the<br />

atmosphere. These matters as they pertain to radar echoes are discussed<br />

in Sees. 2“12 and 2.15. It should be noted, however, that the<br />

numerical factors appropriate here are the square roots of those for radar<br />

signals, when for the latter the effects on both the transmitted and<br />

reflected pulses are lumped together. These factors drop out of the<br />

expression (4) just as the antenna gains do, since they have the same value<br />

for both links. In any beacon system in which the frequencies of interrogation<br />

and reply are substantially different, however, all of the factors<br />

in Eqs. (2) and (3) must be retained and these additional ones must be<br />

added. The two links have to be designed separately to get proper<br />

operation at all ranges up to some fixed value or to meet other particular<br />

requirements.<br />

It is apparent from Eq. (1) that another consequence of the independence<br />

of the two links is a different law for the relation between signal<br />

strength and range. <strong>Radar</strong> echoes vary in pulse power as the inverse<br />

fourth power of the free-space range, whereas beacon replies vary only as<br />

the inverse square. In general, beacon signals do not vary as much<br />

between particular values of range, do not cut off as abruptly with<br />

increasing range, and do not give as deep interference minima as radar<br />

signals do.<br />

A zimuth.—One further consequence of the separation of the two links<br />

is that the scanning sector through which beacon replies are obtained is<br />

limited either in the interrogation link or in the reply link according to<br />

circumstances. Equation (1) becomes more generally<br />

(4)<br />

(5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!