12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 RADAR BEACONS [SEC.84<br />

restricted scope. Mention should be made, however, of the more general<br />

problem of identification, which gave rise to a system known as IFF—<br />

Identification of Friend or Foe. This system was probably the most<br />

important single field of application of radar beacons in the war. The<br />

goal was to provide every friendly military ship and aircraft with a transponder<br />

that would give an identifying reply signal in response to proper<br />

interrogation. Since the location of the ship or aircraft in question was<br />

almost always determined by radar, the problem was actually one of<br />

determining the friendly or hostile character of radar targets. The IFF<br />

interrogating equipment was thus used in the great majority of cases as<br />

an adjunct to a radar set. The problem was enormously difficult in view<br />

of the rapid development of many types of radar sets in both Britain and<br />

America, the tremendous density of airplane traffic to be dealt with in<br />

many theaters and the necessity for having replies coded with sufficient<br />

elaborateness to prevent the effective use of captured IFF transponders<br />

by the enemy for deception. In addition to these and other inherent<br />

technical difficulties, there were still others of a political sort. Among<br />

these were the problems of getting agreement among the many branches<br />

of the British and U.S. Armed Services concerning details of desired<br />

characteristics of systems and of planning manufacture, distribution,<br />

installation, and maintenance of equipment in such a way that an IFF<br />

system could actually go into effective widespread use in a theater by<br />

some target date. It seems that problems of this sort are to be encountered<br />

in connection with any such system that is meant to have widespread<br />

use. In spite of all these difficulties, one such system was put<br />

into use in nearly all theakers, and was of great help where its potentialities<br />

were understood and its limited traffic-handling capacity was not<br />

exceeded. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to go further into the<br />

problems of IFF. A peace-time requirement that is likely to pose problems<br />

of similar character, although of lesser complexity, is that of control<br />

of air traffic in the neighborhood of airports where the traffic is likely to<br />

be heavy.<br />

8.4. <strong>Radar</strong> Interrogation vs. Special Interrogators.-Much of the<br />

preceding discussion implies that beacons are to be used principally with<br />

radar sets and to be interrogated by them. For IFF, however, because<br />

of the great variety of radar sets at different wavelengths, it is necessary<br />

to pick particular bands of frequencies for the IFF beacons and to supply<br />

supplementary interrogating equipment to work with the radars. For<br />

every proposed radar application where beacons would be of use, the<br />

question will arise whether it is better to use radar beacons or to provide<br />

such separate equipment to work at frequencies set aside for the purpose.<br />

There seems to be no single correct answer. Separate cases must be<br />

considered separately, but it is desirable that in so doing the proposed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!