12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 ANTENNAS, SCANNERS, AND STABILIZATION [SEC. 917<br />

is a misalignment between the beam axis and horizontal, the synchros in<br />

the gyro-torque unit transmit the error to the amplifier, a phase-sensitive<br />

detector whose output controls the servomotor, which in turn causes the<br />

linkage system to tilt the antenna up or down until the beam axis is again<br />

horizontal. Because the gyro is mounted on the scanner, it is liable to<br />

the precession caused by the inertia of the supporting gimbal system.<br />

Under some conditions this precession causes the gyro to indicate a false<br />

vertical, thus producing serious errors in the stabilization system.<br />

Although in the above example the gyro is mounted on the rotating<br />

yoke, the effects of precession are avoided in the most recent designs<br />

by mounting the gyro on the airframe and providing a take-off on each<br />

gimbal axis. A voltage indicating the correct tilt angle is fed to the<br />

servoamplifier. A special rotary inductor mounted on the scanner base<br />

provides this voltage, which it computes as a function of the antenna<br />

relative azimuth and the roll and pitch voltages from the gyro.<br />

As previously discussed, the purpose of antenna stabilization is to<br />

preserve range performance by assuring constant illumination in nonlevel<br />

flight as in level flight. In considering the accuracy requirements<br />

various factors must be compared, such as beam shape and operational<br />

use contemplated for the radar. If a pencil beam moves up or down<br />

because of maneuvers of the aircraft or poor stabilization, the scope<br />

signal will fade. Quantitatively, if a beam moves up or down by one-half<br />

its beamwidth, it can be shown that the set will suffer a range reduction<br />

of 29 per cent. The range will be reduced 10 per cent if the beam varies<br />

from the stabilized position by 0.28 beamwidth and by 5 per cent if the<br />

beam varies 0.19 beamwidth. As a range reduction of 10 per cent is<br />

considered the maximum allowable, it can be seen that the beam must be<br />

stabilized so that it remains within 0.28 beamwidt h of a completely<br />

stabilized position. The adequacy of the above calculations has been<br />

verified by rough observations in flight. Beam stabilization in current<br />

airborne navigation radars should be accurate within about t 1.3°,<br />

depending on the set, lest range performance suffer noticeably.<br />

In practice it is quite difficult to realize stabilization accuracies high<br />

enough to satisfy the foregoing tolerances for the various types of beams<br />

and radars. This is principally due to the early stage of airborne stabilization<br />

development and the stringent weight requirements on airborne<br />

gyroscopes. Current developments should lead to more highly accurate<br />

lightweight airborne antenna stabilization. The present static accuracy<br />

of airborne gyros ranges from + # to + #. However, errors of from<br />

1° to 5° may occur if the erection mechanism is not cut off in a turn.<br />

This error is a function of the duration of the turn.<br />

Shipborne Antenna Stabilization.—In recent practice the stabilization<br />

of airborne ground-mapping antennas is by the line-of-sight method, in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!