12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

t$Ec. 9,18] DATA STABILIZATION 311<br />

let the antenna scan umi’ormly during search and to control the deflecting<br />

coil of the indicator to correct the deck-tilt error. This is a species of<br />

data stabilization; it is not commonly used. The other cure for the<br />

deck-tilt error is to drive the azimuth sweep of the radar indicator at a<br />

constant rate during search and to control the train angle of the antenna<br />

by means of a computer and servomechanism. As we have seen, it is one<br />

of the functions of the computer to provide the deck-tilt correction.<br />

This computation is easily mechanized, because the deck-tilt error is<br />

mathematically similar to the error in transmitting angular motion<br />

through a universal joint.<br />

The gyroscopes used in shipborne antenna stabilization are accurate<br />

to within 2’ to 7’; the error seems to be a function of the roll, pitch, and<br />

heading of the vessel. The large synchros used in this work are liable<br />

to err by about 10’ to 30’. It follows that a good shipborne equipment,<br />

using synchros geared as high as 36 to 1 for increased accuracy, holds the<br />

beam with an average error of as little as 5’, although momentary errors<br />

of more than twice this magnitude may al ise.<br />

9.18. Data Stab~zation. ‘—It has been remarked that even after the<br />

mechanical engineer has provided a stabilized antenna mount and thereby<br />

ensured that the radar will correctly perform its scanning function despite<br />

rolling or pitching of the vehicle, the indicator may still display the position<br />

of targets falsely. We are concerned in this section with the problem<br />

of improving the indicator in this respect.<br />

The older PPI radars, both airborne and shipborne, were designed to<br />

display targets at their bearings relative to the heading of the vehicle.<br />

More recent design allows a display of targets in their true bearings, that<br />

is, with north at the top of the screen regardless of heading. The relative-bearing<br />

indication is bad for two reasons: (1) the entire display<br />

rotates and becomes confused if the course of the vehicle is altered; (2)<br />

the natural random changes in the heading of the vehicle cause a corresponding<br />

blurring of the display on the persistent screen. The truebearing<br />

indication is free of these faults. It is a data stabilization in<br />

regard to yaw and changes of heading.<br />

Yaw stabilization is implemented with the aid of a horizontal gyroscope<br />

which is kept pointing north by manual or automatic reference to<br />

the earth’s magnetic field. Through a mechanical or electrical differential<br />

there is provided at the indicator a voltage signifying the true bearing<br />

of the beam, that is, the difference between the relative bearing of the<br />

beam and the relative bearing of the true north.<br />

Deck-tilt error is serious in airborne as well as in shipborne radar.<br />

Let us imagine an airplane equipped with a bombing radar having a fan<br />

beam; the base of the scanner is not stabilized, and the antenna may or<br />

1Sees. 9.1S-9.20 by W. M. Cady.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!