12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

638 MOVING TARGET INDICATION [SEC. 16.5<br />

it k also difficult if the stable r-f oscillator is to be locked, because of the<br />

high Q required to make the oscillator stable. Locking a coherent i-f<br />

oscillator is easy since the Q can be smaller by a factor of 100 for the<br />

same allowed rate of frequency change. The scheme of Fig. 16.13b,<br />

which uses i-f locking and i-f adding, is inconvenient because it requiresa<br />

power amplifier.<br />

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND CHOICE OF SYSTEM CONSTANTS<br />

The primary objective of moving-target indication is, of course, to<br />

attain a high degree of discrimination in favor of the echoes from moving<br />

targets compared tothose from fixed ones. In order that this beaccomplished<br />

it is necessary that echoes, or clutter, from fixed targets be<br />

eliminated or greatly reduced and that those from moving targets be<br />

retained with optimum sensitivity compared to the residual clutter and<br />

the inherent<br />

noise of the receiver.<br />

Since the recognition of moving targets is based upon changes in the<br />

returning echo from one pulse to the next, any changes present in the<br />

signals from the fixed echoes will interfere with their elimination. Such<br />

undesirable variations are of two sorts: (1) those inherently present in the<br />

returning echoes, principally due to internal motions of the targets<br />

themselves or to the effects of scanning; (2) spurious variations due to<br />

instabilities or other shortcomings of the radar equipment. The methods<br />

used and the constants chosen for the set should be selected in such a<br />

way as to minimize the effects of the inherent fluctuations. The elimination<br />

of spurious variations is largely a matter of careful engineering design.<br />

Another factor to be considered in the choice of system parameters is<br />

that since different radial velocities produce different changes in relative<br />

phase from pulse to pulse, certain velocity intervals are much more<br />

effective than others in producing large uncanceled signals. Indeed, a<br />

phase change of one cyclethat is, a radial motion of one-half wavelength<br />

between pulses—is equivalent to no change at all. Thus there are certain<br />

“blind” velocity intervals in which the mass motion of the target does<br />

not lead to a discernible indication. Since the velocities about which<br />

these intervals are centered are determined by the wavelength and the<br />

pulse repetition rate of the set, it is possible, within limits, to arrange that<br />

they fall as little as possible in the range of velocities to be expected for the<br />

targets of interest.<br />

The various factors dealing with clutter elimination ,and target<br />

visibility on a fixed system will be discussed in detail from both the theoretical<br />

and the practical standpoint in the next few sections. The additional<br />

factors present when the system is moving will be introduced later.<br />

16.5. Stability Requirements. Frequency of the Beating Oscillators.—<br />

The amplitude of the video signal from a stationary target can be written

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!