12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEC. 125] SECOND DETECTOR 449<br />

This combined response curve has the same shape as that for a transitionally<br />

coupled double-tuned circuit, so that the advantage of cascading<br />

is preserved. In actual practice, a receiver that has a gain of 100 db with,<br />

for example, six stages, will be approximately twice as wide if staggered<br />

pairs are used as it would be if single-tuned circuits were used (Fig. 12.8).<br />

The principle of stagger tuning can be carried further. Staggered<br />

triples (three different frequencies) are in fairly common use, and staggered<br />

n-uples are practicable for wideband amplifiers. The advantage<br />

of stagger-tuned amplifiers lies in the fact that simple single-tuned circuits<br />

are used throughout, a fact that makes for ease of manufacture and<br />

servicing.<br />

There are other schemes for obtaining large bandwidths. Feedback<br />

pairsl and feedback chainsz have both been used fairly extensively.<br />

More recently a scheme of stagger damping has been proposed. s<br />

Before leaving the problem of i-f amplifier design, some mention of the<br />

gain required will be necessary. To detect signals barely visible above<br />

the noise it is necessary that the noise originating in the input circuit and<br />

the first stage be amplified to a point where it is easily visible on the indicator.<br />

How this gain will be split between the i-f and video amplifiers<br />

depends upon such considerations as second-detector efficiency and the<br />

complication involved in building high-gain video amplifiers. In most<br />

receivers the i-f gain is enough to amplify noise to 1 or 2 volts, thus bringing<br />

it into the linear region where diode detectors have maximum efficiency.<br />

This requires a gain of around 106 times at the intermediate<br />

frequency. Building an i-f amplifier with this gain while avoiding trouble<br />

with regenerative feedback has been one of the most difficult problems in<br />

radar receiver design. Ground current loops must be confined by careful<br />

bypassing and grounding; power leads must be proper] y filtered; coils<br />

must be wound and spaced intelligently; the shielding must be adequate.<br />

Careful attention must be paid to all of these items if the over-all response<br />

characteristic is to bear any resemblance to what is expected.<br />

12.5. Second Detector.—The purpose of the second detector is to<br />

produce a rectified voltage that is proportional to the amplitude of the<br />

i-f waves. In most receivers it is important that this rectified voltage be<br />

proportional to the first power of the i-f amplitude (linear detector).<br />

However, in radar receivers higher powers are permissible so long as<br />

reasonable efficiency is maintained. One of the simplest and most com-<br />

I Bartelink et. al., “Flat Response Single Tuned I-f Amplifier,” GE Report, hfay 8,<br />

1943.<br />

2A. J. Ferguson, “The Theory of I-f Amplifier with Negative Feedback,” Canadian<br />

National Research Council Radio Branch Report PRA-59.<br />

s H. Wallman, “Stagger-damped Double-tuned Circuits,” RL Report h-o. 53s,<br />

March 23, 1944,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!